Which government bodies are involved in Jorge Sanchez Case Number: SURW25-00012 Application (File 26-0461)?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Council.

Jorge Sanchez Case Number: SURW25-00012 Application (File 26-0461)

Q: What is the current status of An Ordinance vacating a portion of a 60 foot road out of O.A. Danielson Survey No. 310, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas. Subject property: West of Zaragoza Rd. and North of Interstate 10 Hwy. Applicant: Jorge Sanchez Case Number: SURW25-00012?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-04-28 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Council.

Q: When was Jorge Sanchez Case Number: SURW25-00012 Application (File 26-0461) first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-04-14 00:00:00+00.

View full legal title

An Ordinance vacating a portion of a 60 foot road out of O.A. Danielson Survey No. 310, City of El Paso, El Paso County, Texas. Subject property: West of Zaragoza Rd. and North of Interstate 10 Hwy. Applicant: Jorge Sanchez Case Number: SURW25-00012

active

Zoning CasecorridorNotableCity Council

The proposal would vacate a portion of a 60-foot public road in the O.A. Danielson Survey area west of Zaragoza Road and north of Interstate 10. This road vacation could affect property access and how the surrounding area develops.

2 eventsFirst seen Apr 14, 2026Last activity Apr 28, 2026File #: 26-0461

Topics

zoning

development

permit

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .

Attorney

Verify public notice for corridor rezoning Item 19

Why now: Item 19 (File 26-0461) passed first reading 8-0 on 2026-04-14 inside a block motion spanning Items 15-19, then was adopted individually on 2026-04-28 on a motion by Fierro, seconded by Limón.

What to do: Confirm Item 19 received individual public notice and hearing before its 8-0 first-reading vote — it was folded into a single block motion covering Items 15-19 rather than heard on its own, and since the ordinance was adopted nearly three months ago, any window to challenge a notice defect is closing fast.

Act before: After statutory challenge period expires

Source: City Council — Apr 28, 2026 →

Journalist

Ask why corridor zoning Item 19 had no debate

Why now: Item 19 (File 26-0461) carried 8-0 inside a block motion covering Items 15-19, then came back for a standalone roll-call adoption on 2026-04-28 with a motion by Fierro, seconded by Limón.

What to do: Request the 2026-04-14 meeting recording or transcript to check whether any council member or resident spoke to Item 19 specifically — it was one of five unrelated items (15-19) cleared in a single block motion, an unusual path for a zoning case that would normally get its own hearing.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Council — Apr 28, 2026 →