Case File 26-0004
View full legal title
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.
Actions
Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .
Obtain ethics complaint forms and June 4 meeting record
Why now: The May 21 minutes show discussion only, a 0-0 result with no motion made, and a special preliminary review meeting set for June 4, while the April 16 entry pairs the Hernandez complaint with a discussion of the complaint form process.
What to do: Request the filed complaint forms against Gil Hernandez, Kaylynn Paxson, and Eric Cantu, their written responses, and the minutes of the June 4 special meeting called for preliminary review — then ask the commission which rule governs form sufficiency, since the April 16 discussion covered the complaint form process itself. If the forms were defective or the preliminary review was never held on record, any later finding rests on an unverified foundation.
Act before: After the requested complaint forms and June 4 minutes are produced
Ask why ethics complaints sat on five straight agendas
Why now: The item recurs across February 19, March 19, April 16, May 21, and June 10 with 'None' recorded for February and March and a 0-0 no-motion result in May, and no record of what the scheduled June 4 special meeting produced.
What to do: Ask the Ethics Commission why the same outstanding-ethics-complaints item appeared on the February 19 and March 19 agendas with no discussion recorded at all, then surfaced in April with a named respondent — and whether the June 4 preliminary review actually convened, since the June 10 agenda carries the item forward with no outcome noted. Pin down when each complaint was filed versus when it was first discussed publicly.
Act before: After the June 4 special meeting record or commission response is produced
Timeline
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Discussion on Ethics Complaints filed against Gil Hernandez, Kaylynn Paxson, and Eric Cantu; and responses by Gil Hernandez, Kaylynn Paxson and Eric Cantu. Special meeting for preliminary review of ethics complaints scheduled for June 4, 2026.
Vote: 0 for, 0 against
Discussion only; ethics complaints against Gil Hernandez, Kaylynn Paxson, and Eric Cantu discussed with responses; special meeting for preliminary review scheduled for June 4, 2026; no motion made
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Vote: 0 for, 0 against
discussion on Ethics Complaint filed against Gil Hernandez and complaint form process; no action taken
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Vote: 0 for, 0 against
no outstanding ethics complaints; none
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Vote: 0 for, 0 against
outstanding Ethics Complaints - none presented
Review, discussion, and possible action regarding outstanding Ethics Complaints:
Vote: 0 for, 0 against
no action taken (None)