Support for Haul Out and Marina Office Project (26-0294)

Context: The June 22 minutes state only that "the City's legal department went over the resolution and did not have any corrections or suggestions" before the 8-0 vote, with Steve Indrelunas excused.

Recommended: Request the city legal department's written review or correspondence on the haul out and marina office resolution and confirm in writing whether that review covered only the resolution language or also the underlying construction contract. If the review was limited to the resolution, the committee's unanimous endorsement carries no vetting of contract terms, indemnity, or bonding.

Context: The Marina Advisory Committee voted 8-0 on June 22 to support a resolution headed to City Council on June 23, and the matter's status remains active with no recorded next procedural step.

Recommended: Pull the June 23 City Council action to confirm the haul out and marina office contract was awarded and to obtain the funded scope, schedule, and contractor before planning any marine-service work that depends on new vessel haul out capacity at this marina. The advisory committee's resolution is support only and does not itself authorize construction.

Context: Mr. Herrington presented the resolution on June 22 for a council vote the next day, June 23, and the minutes record only that legal reviewed the resolution text — no contract value, bidder, or scope appears in either the June 1 or June 22 record.

Recommended: Request the June 23 City Council agenda packet and the underlying haul out and marina office construction contract — the committee's two appearances on this item (June 1 and June 22) never name a contractor, a dollar amount, or a bid process. Ask staff how an advisory body endorsed a construction contract one day before the council award without those terms appearing in its own minutes.