Which government bodies are involved in Case File 26-0313?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Council.

When was Case File 26-0313 first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-03-17 00:00:00+00.

Case File 26-0313

Q: What is the current status of Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), §8.5 to revise water and wastewater trust fund administration, fees, and reimbursement procedures; §8.4 UDC to revise participation agreements; and providing for publication.?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-03-24 00:00:00+00, this matter is resolved. It has appeared in 2 events across City Council.

View full legal title

Ordinance amending the Unified Development Code (“UDC”), §8.5 to revise water and wastewater trust fund administration, fees, and reimbursement procedures; §8.4 UDC to revise participation agreements; and providing for publication.

site_specificCity Council

The city council amended the Unified Development Code to revise how water and wastewater trust funds are administered, including changes to fee structures, reimbursement procedures, and participation agreements. These changes governed the management of water and wastewater infrastructure funding and cost recovery mechanisms citywide. The ordinance was approved by a vote of 8 to 1.

2 eventsFirst seen Mar 17, 2026Last activity Mar 24, 2026File #: 26-0313

City Council: Carried: 8 to 1 — Mar 24, 2026

Topics

utilities

development

policy

public_hearing

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney

As of Mar 2026

Check if existing trust fund agreements are grandfathered

Applies if: You represent a client with an existing water/wastewater trust fund participation agreement

Context: Item 8 amended 'trust funds, fees, and participation agreements' and passed 8-1, with Council Member Campos as the sole no vote after pulling it from consent.

Recommended: The ordinance amended participation agreement terms as well as fees, so confirm with the city whether agreements signed before the 2026-03-24 adoption date are grandfathered under prior terms or must be renegotiated.

Source: City Council — Mar 24, 2026 →

Developer

As of Mar 2026

Pull the amended water and wastewater trust fund fee schedule

Applies if: You have a project in a water/wastewater trust fund district

Context: On first reading 2026-03-17, Council Member Hernandez moved 'option 2 amending the Unified Development Code and keeping trust funds,' which then passed second reading 8-1 on 2026-03-24.

Recommended: Council rejected the CIAC's impact-fee option and instead kept the trust fund system under revised administration, fees, and participation agreement terms — get the new schedule from Development Services before pricing any project in a trust fund district.

Source: City Council — Mar 24, 2026 →

Journalist

As of Mar 2026

Ask Campos why he reversed on the trust fund ordinance

Context: First reading carried 8-0 on 2026-03-17; second reading carried 8-1 on 2026-03-24 with Campos as the lone dissent after pulling it from consent.

Recommended: Campos voted with the unanimous majority on first reading, then pulled the same item off consent nine days later to vote no alone — request his office's explanation and any written statement he entered into the record.

Source: City Council — Mar 24, 2026 →

Lobbyist

As of Mar 2026

Target Campos on future trust fund and impact fee items

Context: Campos voted yes on first reading 8-0 (2026-03-17) but pulled the item from consent to vote no on second reading, 8-1 (2026-03-24).

Recommended: Campos is now the identified swing vote on trust fund policy — he broke from a unanimous council to pull this item and vote no, so any group pushing to revisit impact fees should engage him directly before the next related item reaches the dais.

Source: City Council — Mar 24, 2026 →