Which government bodies are involved in Code Amendment File 26-1383?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Council.

When was Code Amendment File 26-1383 first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-09-01 00:00:00+00.

Code Amendment File 26-1383

Q: What is the current status of Ordinance amending various sections of the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 49, Streets and Sidewalks and Chapter 53 Traffic, by reinstating applicable fees for oversized and overweight structures, removing fees related to meter-bagging, removing duplicative language and providing an effective date.?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-09-08 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Council.

View full legal title

Ordinance amending various sections of the Code of Ordinances, Chapter 49, Streets and Sidewalks and Chapter 53 Traffic, by reinstating applicable fees for oversized and overweight structures, removing fees related to meter-bagging, removing duplicative language and providing an effective date.

active

Code AmendmentcitywideSignificantCity Council

The ordinance would amend the city's Streets and Sidewalks and Traffic codes to reinstate applicable fees for oversized and overweight structures and remove fees related to meter-bagging. It would also remove duplicative language from the code.

2 eventsFirst seen Sep 1, 2026Last activity Sep 8, 2026File #: 26-1383

Topics

policy

permit

transportation

public_hearing

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .

Contractor

Check reinstated oversized and overweight structure fees before bidding

Applies if: You move oversized or overweight loads or structures, or reserve metered parking for work zones, in the city

Why now: Ordinance Enactment No. 034013, approved 7-1 on 2026-09-08, reinstates fees for oversized and overweight structures and removes meter-bagging fees, but the record verifies no effective date[MATTER].

What to do: Pull the amended Chapter 49 and Chapter 53 text and the fee schedule to see which oversized and overweight structure fees now apply, and build them into bids for jobs that move such loads or structures on city streets. Also confirm that meter-bagging fees are gone, so you do not budget for them.

Act before: After the next material record update

Source: City Council — Sep 08, 2026 →

Journalist

Ask why mayor abstained on street fee ordinance

Why now: The ordinance passed first reading 8-0 on 2026-09-01 with no public comments, then passed second reading 7-1 with Paxson against and Mayor Guajardo abstaining (Enactment No. 034013).

What to do: Ask the city for the reason Mayor Guajardo abstained and why Mayor Pro Tem Paxson voted no on second reading, after no one objected the week before. Also ask which fees are being reinstated and whether the removed meter-bagging fees were replaced by anything.

Act before: After the requested records are produced

Source: City Council — Sep 08, 2026 →