Parks and Recreation Committee Priorities Survey Review (26-1423)
View full legal title
Review of Committee Priorities Survey
Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.
Actions
Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .
Ask which survey priorities came from the parks survey
Why now: The item has appeared three times (2026-09-09, 2026-10-14, 2026-11-11), and only the first meeting's record shows discussion of the aquatic roadmap and nonprofit ideas, with no action taken.
What to do: Request the Committee Priorities Survey results and any draft priority list, then compare them with the two initiatives Chair Cronnon raised. This would show whether the aquatic roadmap and parks nonprofit ideas come from survey responses or from the chair.
Act before: After the requested records are produced
Propose a parks nonprofit and aquatic roadmap to committee
Applies if: You use city parks or aquatic facilities
Why now: At the 2026-09-09 meeting Chair Cronnon proposed a future aquatic development roadmap and a "Friends of the Park"-style nonprofit, no action was taken, and the survey review reappears on 2026-10-14 and 2026-11-11, its third appearance.
What to do: If you use city parks or pools, send the committee your view on the two ideas Chair Cronnon raised: an aquatic development roadmap and a community nonprofit supporting parks. Ideas not yet adopted as priorities are easier to shape now than after the survey review settles.
Act before: After the next material record update
Timeline
Review of Committee Priorities Survey
Review of Committee Priorities Survey
Chair Cronnon began discussion with adding an initiative for a roadmap for future aquatic development. Another initiative could be to help develop a community non-profit organization that supports parks and the Parks & Recreation Department. The idea of a non-profit organization such as "Friends of the Park" is common in other municipalities. No action was taken on this item.