PD Amendment ZC-25-205
View full legal title
(CD 8) Beau Galyean Inc. & Gayla Karanges / Rhett Bennett, Black Mountain / Bob Riley, Halff; 4500 & 8212 Anglin Circle, (38.38 acres) From: "B" Two-Family Residential and "AG" Agricultural To: "PD/I" Planned Development for all uses in "I" Light Industrial limited to data center, education uses, governmental offices (excluding correctional facility and probation or parole office) health care facilities, recreational, religious uses, utilities, grocery store, office or retail sales general, with development standards to increase setback of 75 feet adjacent to residential districts, increase the maximum building height to 70 feet for data center, building setback minimum of 300 feet from (8100 Anglin Drive); site plan waiver requested (Recommended for Approval as Amended by the Zoning Commission for a site plan required) (Continued from a Previous Meeting)
Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.
Actions
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Check Re-Notice and Vote Rules Before June Planned Development Hearing
Context: The February 10 continuation is documented as 'Motion passed 11-0' with named movers Nettles and Beck; the March 10 continuation appears in the record only as 'consensus of the City Council' with no vote count — a procedural distinction that creates an exploitable gap.
Recommended: Pull Fort Worth's zoning ordinance re-notice provisions and confirm whether the 91-day gap between March 10 and June 9 triggers mandatory mailed-notice to neighboring property owners; also verify whether the March 10 continuation by 'consensus' — with no recorded vote — was procedurally sufficient, since either defect would expose the June 9 action to a challenge that could void the council's decision.
Request Records on Unrecorded March Planned Development Continuance
Context: The February 10 record states 'Motion passed 11-0' with named movers Nettles and Beck; the March 10 record states only 'consensus of the City Council' with no vote count and no stated reason for extending the delay from 28 days to 91 days.
Recommended: File a public records request for the March 10 staff report and any applicant correspondence tied to this planned development amendment, and ask the City Clerk whether Fort Worth rules require a recorded vote for zoning continuances — the shift from a documented 11-0 motion to an unrecorded 'consensus' is an anomaly that an affected party could use to challenge the June 9 hearing.
Schedule Meetings With Nettles and Beck Before June Planned Development Vote
Context: Nettles made the February 10 motion and Beck seconded it (passed 11-0), making them the documented sponsors of the two-step delay now culminating in the June 9, 2026 hearing.
Recommended: Contact Council Members Nettles and Beck — who sponsored the February 10 continuance motion — and confirm which council district the subject site falls in, since that district's representative controls floor time and amendment rights at the June 9 hearing; the roughly 60-day window before June 9 is the last structured access point before the council must act.
Key Entities
View relationship map
Loading relationship map…
Timeline
It was the consensus of the City Council that Zoning Docket ZC-25-205 be continued to the June 9, 2026, Council meeting.
Council Member Nettles made a motion, seconded by Council Member Beck, that Zoning Docket ZC-25-205 continued to the March 10, 2026, Council meeting. Motion passed 11-0.