Municue

Austin Search

Search meetings, agenda items, press releases, entities, and insights.

Search in:|

191 results for “housing” in past 3 months

available in the Fiscal Year 2026-2028 Capital Budget of the Austin Housing Finance Corporation through the General Obligation Bond funds. Authorize amendments to existing contracts with the Austin Area

Meeting
Oct 8, 2026— Austin Housing Finance Corporation
$10.0M

David Ferguson - 6200 Menchaca Affordable/Low Income Housing David Ferguson - 6200 Menchaca Affordable/Low Income Housing

Meeting
Sep 10, 2026— City Council

police performance measures and misconduct records. A second thread is the $90,506,483 housing services agreement with the Austin Housing Finance Corporation, an unusually large single authorization routed through

Insight
Aug 17, 2026— For: journalist

AHFC service agreement (#12) is a proposed delivery vehicle for FY 2026-2027 housing programs, and two resolutions propose new review processes for social services contracting performance. The contracting items

Insight
Aug 12, 2026— For: contractor

window to influence FY 2026-2027 AHFC housing funding closes at this meeting, since both budget resolutions delegate program guideline development to staff after adoption. The window to influence

Insight
Aug 17, 2026— For: lobbyist

million housing package — including a $90,506,483 not-to-exceed service agreement between AHFC and the City of Austin — is scheduled entirely on the consent agenda, which

Insight
Aug 17, 2026— For: journalist

Manager's administrative approval limits and program guidelines would shape how FY 2026-2027 housing funds are distributed. If the resolutions are adopted, the General Manager's administrative approval limits

Insight
Aug 14, 2026— For: lobbyist

housing agreement (Item 12) and the police-related resolutions (Items 6, 7, 8 and 9) are the clearest story threads. The $90,506,483 housing agreement (Item

Insight
Aug 14, 2026— For: journalist

Blueprint resolution (File 26-2620) and policy briefings where staff presenters from Austin Housing, Austin Planning, and the City Manager's Office were named. The committee agenda featured a Blueprint

Insight
Oct 13, 2026— For: lobbyist

addressed permanent supportive solutions for high utilizers of crisis response services, a housing-related topic. The No Wrong Door update (File 26-2681) addressed permanent supportive solutions for high utilizers

Insight
Oct 7, 2026— For: resident

waiver for The Bloom at Lamar Square is a signal for affordable housing proposals. Staff recommendations to grant the rezonings suggest receptiveness to added density on the listed sites

Insight
Sep 24, 2026— For: developer

exceed service agreement under which AHFC would run City housing programs. The agenda concentrates the entirety of AHFC's FY 2026-2027 financial framework — roughly $181.0 million across three items

Insight
Aug 12, 2026— For: journalist

Based on city records: Entity referenced in Austin city proceedings. Appears in topics: zoning, housing, public_hearing, development, policy

Location
Entity

applicant in Austin city proceedings. Appears in topics: zoning, development, policy, public_hearing, housing

Person
Entity

controversy. The court sits in the Travis County Civil and Family Courts Facility, which houses the county's civil district courts, civil county courts at law, and child support court

Organization
Entity

that has appeared as applicant in Austin city proceedings. Appears in topics: zoning, development, housing, policy, public_hearing

Organization
Entity

records: Individual referenced in Austin city proceedings. Appears in topics: zoning, public_hearing, development, housing, policy

Person
Entity

provides community-based mental health, substance use, intellectual and developmental disability, crisis, counseling, and housing-related services

Organization
Entity

Individual who has appeared as applicant in Austin city proceedings. Appears in topics: zoning, housing, public_hearing, development, policy

Person
Entity

requests was to allow expansion of the church facility and potential future housing and commercial space on the site, and the cases were reviewed by the Planning Commission and City

Organization
Entity