Which government bodies are involved in Plano Public Safety Campus Construction Manager (26-585)?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Council.

Plano Public Safety Campus Construction Manager (26-585)

Q: What is the current status of Consideration to approve RFQ No. 2026-0152-B Construction Manager-At-Risk for the City of Plano Public Safety Campus for Special Projects to Swinerton Builders in the amount of $140,000,000; and authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. Approved?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-07-01 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Council.

Q: When was Plano Public Safety Campus Construction Manager (26-585) first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-05-26 00:00:00+00.

View full legal title

Consideration to approve RFQ No. 2026-0152-B Construction Manager-At-Risk for the City of Plano Public Safety Campus for Special Projects to Swinerton Builders in the amount of $140,000,000; and authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. Approved

active

site_specificCity Council

The City of Plano is awarding a $140 million contract to Swinerton Builders to serve as Construction Manager-At-Risk for the Public Safety Campus, which will consolidate and modernize the city's emergency services and law enforcement operations. This major public facility is designed to improve service delivery and operational efficiency for Plano's first responders.

2 eventsFirst seen May 26, 2026Last activity Jul 1, 2026File #: 26-585

Topics

public_safety

contract

development

budget

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .

Attorney

As of Jul 2026

Confirm two-step process for Public Safety Campus contract

Context: Texas Local Government Code Chapter 2269 requires a two-step qualifications-then-price process for CMAR contracts, and this item reached City Council twice — May 26 and July 1, 2026 — a sequence consistent with (but not confirmed as) that statutory process.

Recommended: Pull the procurement file to confirm the city first selected the construction manager based on qualifications, then separately negotiated a guaranteed maximum price, before awarding the $140 million contract; skipping either step exposes the award to a bid protest from a passed-over firm.

Source: City Council — Jul 01, 2026 →

Journalist

As of Jul 2026

Compare May and July votes on Public Safety Campus contract

Context: The $140 million construction manager contract for the Public Safety Campus appeared before City Council twice within five weeks, and the public record does not explain why.

Recommended: Request the staff memos and agenda backup from both the May 26 and July 1, 2026 meetings to find out what changed in the $140 million construction manager award between the two hearings — dollar figure, scope, or negotiated terms the public agenda doesn't explain.

Source: City Council — Jul 01, 2026 →