Municue

PD 166 Multifamily Rezoning at La Prada and Shiloh

View full legal title

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District 166 and to rezone the southwest portion of Planned Development District 166 to MF-2(A) Multifamily District on property between La Prada Dr and Shiloh Road, south of Blyth Drive. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the amendment to PD 166, subject to amended conditions and amended development plan and 2) Approval of MF-2(A) Multifamily District on a portion. Applicant: Nexus Recovery Center Foundation Representative: Rob Baldwin, Baldwin Associates Planner: Teaseia Blue, B.Arch, MBA U/A From: September 18, 2025. Council District: 7 Z245-151 / Z-25-000054

PD AmendmentdistrictMajorCity Council, City Plan CommissionDistrict 166
This matter proposes to amend Planned Development District 166 and rezone its southwest portion to the MF-2(A) Multifamily District, affecting property bounded by La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road south of Blyth Drive. The rezoning would authorize multifamily residential development in an area currently under the broader planned development framework.
3 eventsFirst seen Sep 18, 2025Last activity Nov 12, 2025Case ID: Z-25-000054
City Council: ApprovedNov 12, 2025
Topics
zoning
housing
development
La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney
As of Nov 2025

Reconcile truncated CPC record with adopted Nexus Recovery Center ordinance

Context: The October 9, 2025 City Plan Commission minutes for Z245-151 explicitly note 'Page truncated; notices and speakers data not available in provided pages,' leaving the full conditions recommendation incomplete in the official public record prior to the November 12 Council adoption.

Recommended: Pull the adopted ordinance text from the November 12 City Council vote and compare it line-by-line against the City Plan Commission's October 9 recommended conditions — if the Council ordinance deviates from what commissioners actually approved, that discrepancy could surface as a procedural defect in any future permit challenge or enforcement action against the facility.

Source: City Council — Nov 12, 2025 →
Journalist
As of Nov 2025

Investigate who was excluded from Nexus Recovery Center Shiloh Road notice failure

Context: The September 18, 2025 City Plan Commission hearing on Z245-151 ended with a 0-0 vote and no action because 'the case requires renotification,' meaning the original statutory notice list was facially deficient before the case carried 10-0 on October 9.

Recommended: File a public information request for the original September 2025 notice list and the corrected renotification package to identify which adjacent property owners were cut out of the first hearing — then check whether any of them appeared to object after renotification, or were effectively silenced before a unanimous approval of a substance abuse recovery facility in their neighborhood.

Source: City Council — Nov 12, 2025 →
Resident
As of Nov 2025

Request adopted operating conditions for Nexus Recovery Center at Shiloh Road

Context: The November 12, 2025 City Council adoption of Z245-151 replaced prior planned development restrictions at the Shiloh Road site with new conditions that are not summarized in any publicly available notice or staff report excerpt.

Recommended: Request the full planned development amendment conditions from the November 12 City Council approval to confirm what use restrictions, client capacity limits, and hours of operation now govern the site — these are the only enforceable limits on how the facility can expand or change its programming, and they become harder to contest once construction or new operations begin under the amended approval.

Source: City Council — Nov 12, 2025 →

Timeline

Vote
Approved

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting an amendment to Planned Development District No. 166 and to rezone the southwest portion of Planned Development District No. 166 to MF-2(A) Multifamily District, on property between La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road, south of Blyth Drive Recommendation of Staff: Approval of (1) an amendment to Planned Development District No. 166, subject to an amended development plan and amended conditions; and (2) approval of MF-2(A) Multifamily District on a portion Recommendation of CPC: Approval of (1) an amendment to Planned Development District No. 166, subject to an amended development plan and amended conditions; and (2) approval of MF-2(A) Multifamily District on a portion Z245-151(TB) / Z-25-000054 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Vote
Carried: 10 to 0

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District 166 and to rezone the southwest portion of Planned Development District 166 to MF-2(A) Multifamily District on property between La Prada Dr and Shiloh Road, south of Blyth Drive. Staff Recommendation: Approval of the amendment to PD 166, subject to amended conditions and amended development plan and 2) Approval of MF-2(A) Multifamily District on a portion. Applicant: Nexus Recovery Center Foundation Representative: Rob Baldwin, Baldwin Associates Planner: Teaseia Blue, B.Arch, MBA U/A From: September 18, 2025. Council District: 7 Z245-151 / Z-25-000054

Vote: 10 for, 0 against, 4 absent

recommend approval of amendment to PD 166 with amended conditions and development plan, and MF-2(A) Multifamily District on a portion

Page truncated; notices and speakers data not available in provided pages

Hearing
No action taken

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District 166 on property between La Prada Dr and Shiloh Road, south of Blyth Dr. Staff Recommendation: No action; case requires renotification. Applicant: Nexus Recovery Center Foundation Representative: Rob Baldwin, Baldwin Associates Planner: Teaseia Blue, B.Arch, MBA Council District: 7 Z245-151(TB) / Z-25-000054

Vote: 0 for, 0 against

no action taken; case requires renotification

Item heard individually. No action taken; case requires renotification.