Municue

Thurman Planned Development District Amendment at Edd Road and Garden Grove

View full legal title

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District 752, on the south corner of Edd Road and Garden Grove Drive. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a revised development plan, a traffic management plan, and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Elsie Thurman / Land Use Planning & Zoning Services Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 8 Z-25-000233

active
Zoning CasedistrictCity Plan CommissionDistrict 752
Elsie Thurman is seeking an amendment to Planned Development District 752 at the south corner of Edd Road and Garden Grove Drive. The amendment would modify what development or land uses are allowed on the property, potentially affecting the area's character and traffic patterns. The City Plan Commission will review the request and staff-recommended conditions.
1 eventFirst seen Mar 26, 2026Last activity Mar 26, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000233
Topics
zoning
development

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

File protest petition against Thurman rezoning near Edd Road

Why now: Z-25-000233 was listed Under Advisement at the March 26 City Plan Commission hearing and no rescheduled individual hearing date has been set, leaving the signature-collection window open — once a date is announced, preparation time compresses sharply.

What to do: If you represent property owners within 200 feet of the Edd Road and Garden Grove site, begin collecting signatures for a formal protest petition now — a valid petition shifts the City Council vote from a simple majority to a nine-vote supermajority, substantially raising the bar for passage.

Act before: After City Plan Commission votes on Z-25-000233

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →
Developer

Resolve objections before Thurman rezoning hearing at Edd Road

Why now: At the March 26 City Plan Commission hearing, all four non-routine Planned Development items were listed Under Advisement rather than voted on, signaling unresolved concerns that will determine the outcome at the rescheduled individual hearing.

What to do: Contact the planner assigned to this case to find out specifically why it was separated from the consent docket for individual consideration — resolving those objections before the rescheduled hearing is the most direct path to approval, and arriving unprepared risks a staff denial recommendation.

Act before: After rescheduled City Plan Commission hearing on Z-25-000233

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →
Journalist

Investigate paired Planned Development filings near Edd Road

Why now: The March 26 agenda separated its four Under Advisement items into two distinct clusters — two West Davis Special Purpose District proposals paired together and two additional Planned Development cases including Z-25-000233 paired separately — a grouping the agenda summary does not explain.

What to do: Request the staff reports for both non-West Davis Planned Development cases held Under Advisement at the March 26 City Plan Commission hearing and cross-reference applicants, attorneys of record, and property locations — if the two cases share a representative or are geographically linked, the agenda's unexplained pairing may signal a coordinated rezoning push the public record hints at but does not confirm.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →

Timeline

Hearing
Agenda Ready

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District 752, on the south corner of Edd Road and Garden Grove Drive. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a revised development plan, a traffic management plan, and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Elsie Thurman / Land Use Planning & Zoning Services Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 8 Z-25-000233