Municue

Seminary and Monastery Planned Development at La Prada and Shiloh

View full legal title

An application for a new Planned Development District for TH-3(A) Townhouse District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family and MF-1(A) Multifamily Districts with SUP 2287 for Seminary and a Convent or Monastery, on the west line of La Prada Drive and east line of Shiloh Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a conceptual plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Emad Noorizadeh / The Vylla Homes, LLC Representative: Baldwin Associates, LLC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 7 Z-25-000235

active
SUP ApplicationcorridorNotableCity Council, City Plan CommissionDistrict 7
A Planned Development District application seeks to enable townhouse construction on property near La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road, currently zoned for residential uses. The applicant also requests a Specific Use Permit for a seminary and convent or monastery on the site. This project will shape how this corridor area develops.
2 eventsFirst seen Apr 23, 2026Last activity May 27, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000235
Topics
development
housing
public_hearing
zoning
La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney
As of May 2026

Confirm whether seminary special use permit survives the rezoning

Context: Both the April 23, 2026 Plan Commission item and the May 27, 2026 Council item describe the land as zoned R-7.5(A) and MF-1(A) "with Specific Use Permit No. 2287 for Seminary and a Convent or Monastery," while seeking townhouse district uses; the assigned planner is Mona Hashemi.

Recommended: Obtain the draft ordinance and the planner's file to answer a question the record leaves open: does the new planned development district retain, amend, or terminate the existing specific use permit for the seminary and convent or monastery on this property, and what becomes of that religious use if townhouse development proceeds? Get this in writing before closing or before advising the institution, because the docket language describes the property as still carrying that permit.

Source: City Council — May 27, 2026 →
Developer
As of May 2026

Verify townhouse lot standards in La Prada seminary conceptual plan

Context: Both staff and the City Plan Commission recommended approval only "subject to a conceptual plan and conditions" on the April 23, 2026 item, and the same qualifier carried to the May 27, 2026 Council hearing.

Recommended: Pull the conceptual plan and staff-recommended conditions that the Plan Commission approved for this site and confirm the lot width, density, height and setback numbers actually written into the planned development district — approval was expressly "subject to a conceptual plan and conditions," so the base townhouse district rules are not what governs here. If you underwrite off generic townhouse district yields instead of the conditions, your unit count on the La Prada Drive and Shiloh Road tract may not pencil.

Source: City Council — May 27, 2026 →
Journalist
As of May 2026

Ask why May 27 council hearing shows no recorded outcome

Context: The record shows a May 27, 2026 Council hearing with no result and the matter still active, and the April 23, 2026 minutes for Item 15 read "Carried: 13 to 0" with the note "*Rubin out of room, shown voting in favor."

Recommended: The public hearing was set for May 27, 2026 with both staff and commission recommending approval, yet the file shows no council vote and the matter is still open — request the council minutes and the secretary's action sheet for that date to learn whether the item was held, deferred, or withdrawn. Also ask the clerk why the commission's tally was recorded as unanimous when the minutes note one commissioner was out of the room.

Source: City Council — May 27, 2026 →
Resident
As of May 2026

Check driveway and buffer plans for La Prada townhouses

Context: The application converts a seminary and monastery site zoned single family and multifamily to townhouse district uses on the west line of La Prada Drive and east line of Shiloh Road in Council District 7, approved by the Plan Commission 13-0 on April 23, 2026.

Recommended: Ask the assigned city planner for the conceptual plan and look specifically at where vehicle access points land — on La Prada Drive, on Shiloh Road, or both — and what screening is required where townhouses back up to the existing single-family lots. Access and buffering are set by the conditions attached to this approval, and once the ordinance is adopted those details are locked in.

Source: City Council — May 27, 2026 →

Timeline

Hearing
Hearing Closed; Approved as Amended

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District for TH-3(A) Townhouse District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family and MF-1(A) Multifamily Districts with Specific Use Permit No. 2287 for Seminary and a Convent or Monastery, on the west line of La Prada Drive and east line of Shiloh Road Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a conceptual plan and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a conceptual plan and conditions Z-25-000235 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a new Planned Development District for TH-3(A) Townhouse District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family and MF-1(A) Multifamily Districts with SUP 2287 for Seminary and a Convent or Monastery, on the west line of La Prada Drive and east line of Shiloh Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a conceptual plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Emad Noorizadeh / The Vylla Homes, LLC Representative: Baldwin Associates, LLC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 7 Z-25-000235

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of a new Planned Development District for TH-3(A) Townhouse District uses, subject to amended conceptual plan and staff's recommended conditions

*Rubin out of room, shown voting in favor