Municue

Burk Planned Development District at Royal Lane

View full legal title

An application for a new planned development district for CR Community Retail District uses on property zoned CR Community Retail District and P(A) Parking District, on the south line of Royal Lane and the west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Leland Burk [RLA-PRDA Investments, LP]; JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Representative: Victoria Morris / Jackson Walker LP Planner: Martin Bate / Liliana Garza Council District: 13 Z-26-000007

active
Zoning CasecorridorMajorCity Council, City Plan CommissionDistrict 13
Applicant Leland Burk seeks to create a new planned development district for community retail uses on land currently zoned Community Retail District and Parking District, located on the south line of Royal Lane and the west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane. A planned development district would set a specific development plan and conditions for how the site can be built and used, and the request is reviewed by the City Plan Commission and the City Council in Council District 13.
3 eventsFirst seen Jun 25, 2026Last activity Sep 9, 2026Case ID: Z-26-000007
Topics
zoning
development
public_hearing
Royal Lane and Preston Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney

Request corrected commission minutes for Royal Lane rezoning vote

Why now: Minutes for Item 14 show the amendment failing 13 to 2 while the printed against list also includes the two members identified as the yes votes, and a separate friendly amendment was accepted by motion maker Hall and seconder Kingston before the 10-4 approval on August 6, 2026.

What to do: Ask the Plan Commission secretary for the certified minutes of the August 6 meeting: the roll on the failed amendment is internally inconsistent, listing Kocks and Coffman among the "against" names while the stated tally records them as the only two votes in favor. Get this reconciled before the minutes are approved, and obtain the text of the friendly amendment accepted by Hall and Kingston so you can compare the conditions the commission actually recommended against the conditions in the ordinance presented to Council.

Act before: After the certified minutes and amendment text are produced

Source: City Council — Sep 09, 2026 →
Developer

Confirm allowed uses on Royal Lane parking-district tract

Why now: The June 25, 2026 commission notice described the application as "for CR Community Retail District uses" while the August 6 commission and September 9 Council notices describe it simply as a new planned development district on CR and P(A) Parking District land (Z-26-000007, planners Martin Bate / Liliana Garza).

What to do: Pull the development plan and staff's recommended conditions from the assigned planners to see exactly which uses, height, and parking standards now apply to the former Parking District portion at Royal Lane and Preston Road — the June notice limited the request to Community Retail uses, but the August and September notices dropped that limitation. If the adopted plan is broader than Community Retail, your comparable underwriting for nearby Preston Road pad sites is based on the wrong use table.

Act before: After the adopted development plan and conditions are released

Source: City Council — Sep 09, 2026 →
Journalist

Ask why Royal Lane rezoning was pulled in June

Why now: The chair announced during the June 25, 2026 briefing that Item 14 would not be heard without explanation, the item returned August 6 and passed 10-4 with Hampton, Serrato, Kocks and Coffman opposed, and the September 9, 2026 Council hearing has no recorded result.

What to do: Ask the Plan Commission chair and planners Martin Bate and Liliana Garza why this item was pulled at the June 25 briefing with no stated reason, what changed in the application before it returned on August 6, and whether the September 9 Council hearing produced a vote — the record shows the hearing was set but no outcome. The three-appearance pattern plus the narrowing of the notice language from Community Retail uses to an unqualified planned development district is the thread worth pulling.

Act before: After the requested records are produced

Source: City Council — Sep 09, 2026 →
Resident

Check Orchid Lane buffers in Royal Lane development plan

Why now: The application covers land on the south line of Royal Lane and west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane, in Council District 13, and the commission approved it 10-4 on August 6, 2026 subject to a development plan and staff conditions.

What to do: If you live on or near Orchid Lane, request the development plan and conditions for the site on the south side of Royal Lane at Preston Road — because a planned development district replaces the current Community Retail and Parking District rules, the setbacks, screening, lighting and building height facing your block are set by that plan rather than by the standard code. Four commissioners voted no, so the conditions are worth reading rather than assuming they match what exists today.

Act before: After the next material record update

Source: City Council — Sep 09, 2026 →

Trust Proof

What we said then vs what happened next

We said (Aug 5, 2026):

Review what could be built behind Orchid Lane homes

What happened (Aug 6, 2026):

Carried unanimously

We said (Aug 5, 2026):

Check parking-lot tract's new buildable status at Royal and Preston

What happened (Aug 6, 2026):

Carried unanimously

We said (Aug 5, 2026):

Ask why retail-use limit vanished from Royal Lane rezoning description

What happened (Aug 6, 2026):

Carried unanimously

Timeline

Hearing
Deleted

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District on property zoned CR Community Retail District and P(A) Parking District, on the south line of Royal Lane and the west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions Z-26-000007 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Vote
Carried unanimously

An application for a new planned development district on property zoned CR Community Retail District and P(A) Parking District, on the south line of Royal Lane and the west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Leland Burk [RLA-PRDA Investments, LP]; JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Representative: Victoria Morris, Suzan Kedron [Jackson Walker LLP] Planner: Martin Bate / Liliana Garza Council District: 13 Z-26-000007

Vote: 0 for, 0 against

call the question

Hearing
Not heard

An application for a new planned development district for CR Community Retail District uses on property zoned CR Community Retail District and P(A) Parking District, on the south line of Royal Lane and the west line of Preston Road, north of Orchid Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Leland Burk [RLA-PRDA Investments, LP]; JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Representative: Victoria Morris / Jackson Walker LP Planner: Martin Bate / Liliana Garza Council District: 13 Z-26-000007

Vote: 0 for, 0 against

agenda item would not be heard (announced by the Chair during briefing)

The Chair informed the body during the briefing session that Zoning Cases – Individual, #14, ID #26-2200A, Z-26-000007 would not be heard