Municue
Dallas, TX

Masterplan Non-Residential Subdistrict at Samuell Boulevard

View full legal title

An application for a new subdistrict for specified non-residential uses within Planned Development No. 605, on the south line of Samuell Boulevard, east of Freestone Circle. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Andrew Ruegg / Masterplan U/A From: June 25, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 7 Z-26-000059

active
Zoning Casesite_specificNotableCity Plan CommissionDistrict 7
Andrew Ruegg of Masterplan seeks to create a new subdistrict within Planned Development No. 605 that would allow specified non-residential uses. The site is on the south side of Samuell Boulevard, east of Freestone Circle, in Council District 7.
2 eventsFirst seen Jun 25, 2026Last activity Sep 3, 2026Case ID: Z-26-000059
Topics
zoning
development
District-level area (approximate)·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .

Developer

Verify development plan conditions for non-residential subdistrict on Samuell Boulevard

Applies if: You are evaluating or holding a site in or near the new subdistrict

Why now: The City Plan Commission approved Z-26-000059 14-0 on 2026-09-03 with staff recommending approval 'subject to a development plan and conditions' for specified non-residential uses within Planned Development No. 605.

What to do: Pull the approved development plan and conditions for the new subdistrict and check them against your intended non-residential use before committing capital. Approval was tied to a development plan and conditions, so uses or layouts outside them may not be allowed.

Act before: After the next material record update

Source: City Plan Commission — Sep 03, 2026 →
Journalist

Ask why the subdistrict rezoning was heard twice

Why now: Z-26-000059 passed 15-0 on 2026-06-25 and again 14-0 on 2026-09-03 (marked 'From: June 25, 2026'), yet the record doesn't explain the second hearing or the loss of one vote.

What to do: Request the 2026-06-25 and 2026-09-03 City Plan Commission staff reports and any applicant revisions to explain the roughly ten-week gap. Also ask why the record shows no later Council step when the case is described as approved outside Council.

Act before: After the requested records are produced

Source: City Plan Commission — Sep 03, 2026 →

Timeline

Vote
Carried: 14 to 0
City Plan Commission →

An application for a new subdistrict for specified non-residential uses within Planned Development No. 605, on the south line of Samuell Boulevard, east of Freestone Circle. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Andrew Ruegg / Masterplan U/A From: June 25, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 7 Z-26-000059

Vote: 14 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of a new subdistrict for specified non-residential uses within PD No. 605, subject to a development plan and conditions as read into the record

Vote
Carried: 15 to 0
City Plan Commission →

An application for a new subdistrict for specified non-residential uses within Planned Development No. 605, on the south line of Samuell Boulevard, east of Freestone Circle. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Andrew Ruegg / Masterplan Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 7 Z-26-000059

Vote: 15 for, 0 against

hold under advisement until September 3, 2026

This item was heard individually