Municue

Godinez Commercial Service District at Royal Lane (25-2045A)

View full legal title

An application for a CS Commercial Service District, on property zoned Planned Development District No. 635, on the north side of Royal Lane, between Newkirk Street and Goodnight Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Sergio Godinez Representative: Bill Dahlstrom Planner: Michael Pepe Council District: 6 Z245-174(LC)

inactive
Zoning Casesite_specificCity Plan Commission
Sergio Godinez applied to establish a Commercial Service District on property along Royal Lane between Newkirk Street and Goodnight Lane. The City Plan Commission reviewed the proposal but it stalled without a final decision being implemented.
1 eventFirst seen Jun 12, 2025Last activity Jun 12, 2025File #: 25-2045A
Topics
development
zoning

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney
As of Jun 2025

Review voting record irregularity in Royal Lane rezoning case

Applies if: representing an opposing party or a client with grounds to challenge the vote record

Context: The June 12, 2025 City Plan Commission minutes for Z245-174 include an explicit asterisk: '*Sims out of room, shown voting in favor,' raising a question about the accuracy of the recorded vote count before the case advances.

Recommended: If you represent a party opposing this north Royal Lane rezoning, examine whether the recorded 13-0 vote is procedurally clean before it reaches City Council — the official minutes flag that Commissioner Sims was out of the room but recorded as voting in favor.

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 12, 2025 →
Developer
As of Jun 2025

Secure site control on Royal Lane before City Council vote

Context: Z245-174 cleared the City Plan Commission 13-0 on June 12, 2025 and advances to City Council as its only remaining approval step.

Recommended: If you have development interest in or adjacent to the north side of Royal Lane, the unanimous City Plan Commission approval signals a near-certain entitlement path — locking in site control or adjacent land now avoids post-Council price increases.

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 12, 2025 →
Journalist
As of Jun 2025

Investigate vote recording error in Royal Lane rezoning approval

Context: The official CPC minutes for Z245-174 note '*Sims out of room, shown voting in favor' on a vote recorded as 13-0, which raises a factual question about whether the unanimous tally was accurately captured.

Recommended: Request the City Plan Commission meeting recording, attendance log, and vote sheet from June 12, 2025 to verify whether Commissioner Sims cast a valid vote on this case — the published minutes flag a direct inconsistency.

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 12, 2025 →
Resident
As of Jun 2025

Tell your City Council member about Royal Lane rezoning before the vote

Context: Z245-174 passed the City Plan Commission 13-0 on June 12, 2025 and advances directly to City Council for the binding final vote.

Recommended: If you live near the north side of Royal Lane, contact your district City Council member now to submit your position on this rezoning — City Council is the final decision-maker and the City Plan Commission has already voted to approve it.

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 12, 2025 →

Key Entities

View relationship map

Loading relationship map…

Timeline

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a CS Commercial Service District, on property zoned Planned Development District No. 635, on the north side of Royal Lane, between Newkirk Street and Goodnight Lane. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Sergio Godinez Representative: Bill Dahlstrom Planner: Michael Pepe Council District: 6 Z245-174(LC)

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 2 absent

recommend approval of CS Commercial Service District with deed restrictions

*Sims out of room, shown voting in favor