Zoning Case File 26-1152
View full legal title
Motion to direct staff regarding data center classification and parameters, as requested by Council Members Kaylynn Paxson, Gil Hernandez, and Carolyn Vaughn: 1. Initiate a Unified Development Code amendment to define data centers as a distinct principal land use and amend the City's zoning and permitted-use tables to prohibit data centers in all zoning districts, rather than allowing them to be approved by default under existing office, data processing, utility, warehouse, industrial, or similar land-use categories. 2. An ETJ, utility, infrastructure, and public facilities protection policy requiring data centers and similar high-intensity digital infrastructure projects to enter into an IDA and to fully fund their own infrastructure needs, prevent cost-shifting to residents and ratepayers, provide verified water and wastewater planning, address electric and backup power impacts, mitigate community impacts, and receive separate City Council approval before receiving City utility service, infrastructure participation, development agreement approval, or economic development incentives. 3. The statutory notice, hearing, findings, and ordinance preparation process necessary for City Council consideration of a temporary development moratorium related to data centers and similar high-intensity digital infrastructure use.
Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.
Actions
Showing all 5 actions. Filter by: , , , , .
Check vested rights before Corpus Christi data center moratorium
Applies if: you represent a data center developer or landowner in Corpus Christi
Context: the July 21, 2026 vote directs staff to 'start the process toward a temporary development moratorium' on data centers, but no moratorium ordinance, hearing, or findings have yet been produced.
Recommended: Have counsel confirm vesting status under Texas Local Government Code Chapter 245 for any client with a pending data center application, and track whether the city follows the Chapter 212.135 public-hearing and written-findings requirements before adopting the moratorium — a defective process is a challengeable basis.
Submit data center permits before Corpus Christi moratorium
Applies if: you have a pending or planned data center project in Corpus Christi
Context: Council's July 21, 2026 motion, following Interim Director Yvette Wallace's data center briefing, directs staff to start both the UDC amendment and the moratorium process, with no draft ordinance yet in place.
Recommended: Council just directed staff to begin a Unified Development Code amendment and a temporary moratorium process targeting data centers citywide — get any pending site plan or permit application filed now, since projects without a filed application when the ordinance lands could be frozen for months.
Ask what triggered Corpus Christi's data center crackdown
Context: unlike the meeting's three routine rezonings, which cite established Planning Commission recommendations, the data center item's record gives no detail behind Wallace's presentation or the motion it produced.
Recommended: Request the staff briefing materials Yvette Wallace presented on data centers and Governor Abbott's directive — the meeting record only notes that a briefing occurred, not what specific project, complaint, or state guidance prompted the sudden push toward classification, restriction, and a moratorium.
Lobby staff before Corpus Christi drafts data center rules
Context: the July 21, 2026 motion instructs staff to 'begin' the UDC amendment and moratorium process, meaning the policy is still unwritten and open to input.
Recommended: The UDC amendment and moratorium exist only as a Council directive, not draft language — reach Interim Director of Development Services Yvette Wallace's staff now to negotiate scope, such as carve-outs for already-permitted or renewable-powered facilities, before staff brings a written ordinance back to Council.
Watch for new land rules outside Corpus Christi city limits
Applies if: you own property in the Corpus Christi extraterritorial jurisdiction
Context: the July 21, 2026 motion explicitly targets 'development ... zoning, etc. within the ETJ' and passed on a Council vote.
Recommended: Council Member Hernandez's motion, seconded by Vaughn, directs staff to draft a policy on land use, setbacks, and development standards in the extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) — the area just outside city limits that currently has no city zoning — so property owners there should watch for rules that would newly apply to their land.
Key Entities
View relationship map
Loading relationship map…
Timeline
Motion to direct staff regarding data center classification and parameters, as requested by Council Members Kaylynn Paxson, Gil Hernandez, and Carolyn Vaughn: 1. Initiate a Unified Development Code amendment to define data centers as a distinct principal land use and amend the City's zoning and permitted-use tables to prohibit data centers in all zoning districts, rather than allowing them to be approved by default under existing office, data processing, utility, warehouse, industrial, or similar land-use categories. 2. An ETJ, utility, infrastructure, and public facilities protection policy requiring data centers and similar high-intensity digital infrastructure projects to enter into an IDA and to fully fund their own infrastructure needs, prevent cost-shifting to residents and ratepayers, provide verified water and wastewater planning, address electric and backup power impacts, mitigate community impacts, and receive separate City Council approval before receiving City utility service, infrastructure participation, development agreement approval, or economic development incentives. 3. The statutory notice, hearing, findings, and ordinance preparation process necessary for City Council consideration of a temporary development moratorium related to data centers and similar high-intensity digital infrastructure use.
Vote: 7 for, 1 against
direct staff to develop policy on land use, setbacks, development status for data centers, zoning infrastructure, and potential IDA within the ETJ/city limits
Council Member Campos abstained (1 abstention), accounting for the 7-1 tally out of 9 members present; Enactment No. M2026-070