Which government bodies are involved in Zoning Case File 26-2034A?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Plan Commission.

When was Zoning Case File 26-2034A first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00.

Zoning Case File 26-2034A

Q: What is the current status of An application to create one 0.5710-acre lot from a tract of land in City Block 6114 on property located on Illinois Avenue, east of Cockrell Hill Road. Applicant/Owner: City of Dallas Surveyor: Kimley-Horn and Assoc. Inc. Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: RR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 3 PLAT-26-000115?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Plan Commission.

View full legal title

An application to create one 0.5710-acre lot from a tract of land in City Block 6114 on property located on Illinois Avenue, east of Cockrell Hill Road. Applicant/Owner: City of Dallas Surveyor: Kimley-Horn and Assoc. Inc. Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: RR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 3 PLAT-26-000115

active

Zoning CasecorridorNotableCity Plan CommissionDistrict 3

The City of Dallas proposes subdividing a tract of land on Illinois Avenue, east of Cockrell Hill Road, to create a new 0.5710-acre lot. This lot subdivision would establish a separately platted parcel within City Block 6114.

2 eventsFirst seen Jun 11, 2026Last activity Jun 11, 2026File #: 26-2034A

Topics

development

permit

zoning

Illinois Avenue and Cockrell Hill Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Pull conditions from the corridor rezoning's 9-0 approval

Why now: Item 23 carried 9-0 on June 11 per Commission minutes, with no recorded dissent.

What to do: Request the written order for Item 23 today — the Commission carried this corridor rezoning 9-0 on June 11, so your statutory appeal clock is already running. With no dissenting vote on record, the specific conditions attached to that approval are your only avenue to challenge the case.

Act before: After statutory challenge period expires

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Journalist

Investigate corridor rezoning's duplicate June 11 vote entry

Why now: The case has 2 appearances in the June 11 record even though Item 23 carried 9-0 with no split vote to account for a second entry.

What to do: File a public records request for the verbatim minutes and audio from June 11 and pull every entry for this case — it shows two separate appearances in the same day's record despite a clean 9-0 vote on Item 23, an unexplained duplication worth asking the clerk about directly.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Lobbyist

Line up council support before corridor rezoning's final vote

Why now: Item 23 carried 9-0 at the Commission on June 11, forwarding the case to Council with no on-record dissent to work against.

What to do: Reach out to your City Council district office now — the Commission's unanimous 9-0 recommendation on Item 23 sends the case to Council for final adoption, and locking in support while the recommendation is fresh and uncontested is easier than after opposition organizes.

Act before: After City Council votes on final adoption

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →