City Plan Commission · 10:00 AM · Council Chambers, 6TH Floor
Analysis incorporates data from the official meeting minutes, including vote outcomes, attendance, and public testimony.
Matters
2 contested, 34 unanimous · 36 with voting irregularityVote tally (11) doesn't match named voters (16) — possible absent-member voting irregularity
All Zoning cases
Taylor Madison Application (Z-26-000032)
City Council final vote
Opposition: Carpenter · Kocks · Coffman · Kingston
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Request certified May 21 minutes to document Kocks voting conflict
Context: The May 21 vote record for Item 12 carries an explicit asterisk: '*Kocks out of room, shown voting in favor,' creating a direct conflict between the recorded 14-0 vote and the commissioner's documented absence from the room.
Recommended: Request the certified May 21 City Plan Commission minutes now and compare the official roll-call record against the asterisked note that Commissioner Kocks was out of the room but shown voting in favor — if the 14-0 count includes Kocks in error, the May 21 action is procedurally defective, and any future commission action that treats it as a valid prior record could be challenged on that basis.
Contact City Plan Commission staff about Taylor Madison rezoning stall
Context: The matter logged two separate entries for June 11 and still shows 'next step: Unknown' as of June 18, 2026, despite a 14-0 carry at the May 21 hearing (Item 12, Z-26-000032).
Recommended: Call City Plan Commission staff today to confirm what action was taken at the June 11 hearing and when this case is next calendared — after three appearances including a unanimous 14-0 carry on May 21, the absence of a declared next step as of June 18 suggests the case was passed over or deferred again without notice on an 84-item agenda. A fourth unscheduled appearance adds months to your entitlement timeline.
File records request for June 11 Taylor Madison rezoning outcome
Context: This case appeared twice on the June 11 agenda after a 14-0 carry on May 21, yet shows no declared next step as of June 18 — a pattern across three appearances that suggests a procedural miss on a heavy agenda rather than substantive commission opposition.
Recommended: Request the June 11 City Plan Commission minutes and compare them against this case's dual agenda listing — if the commission took no action on June 11 despite the application appearing twice on an 84-item agenda after a 14-0 preliminary vote, ask staff whether the double-listing caused this case to be skipped, and whether the same thing happened to any of the other four under-advisement cases (#17–#21) on that same session.
Code Amendment DCA256-004
Opposition: Carpenter
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Confirm June 11 Dallas Commission action on citywide zoning amendment
Context: DCA256-004 appeared twice on the June 11 agenda while all 10 non-routine entries that session were under-advisement continuations, creating genuine ambiguity about whether the Commission took a recommending vote or issued a second deferral on June 11, 2026.
Recommended: Pull the City Plan Commission's June 11 action minutes to determine whether DCA256-004 was voted out to City Council or deferred a second time — if the Commission recommended adoption, the statutory challenge window under Texas Local Government Code Chapter 211 is now open and a City Council hearing date may already be scheduled.
Request June 11 Dallas staff report for citywide zoning code amendment
Context: Dallas applies the zoning code in effect at permit issuance, not application submittal, and the matter remains active as of June 18 with no confirmed Council hearing date, meaning adoption could be scheduled with little additional public notice.
Recommended: Request the staff report submitted for DCA256-004 at the June 11 City Plan Commission hearing — it will identify the specific Development Code sections being amended, which determines whether any permit applications you have pending will face new standards at issuance rather than the rules in effect when you filed.
Investigate why Dallas citywide zoning code appeared twice on June 11
Context: DCA256-004 carried two separate docket appearances on June 11, while all 10 non-routine items that session were under-advisement continuations, making it unclear whether the dual listing reflected a collapsed hearing-and-vote procedure or a clerical duplication.
Recommended: Pull the June 11 City Plan Commission meeting minutes and compare how each of DCA256-004's two docket entries was disposed — if the minutes show both a public hearing and a final vote on a citywide code amendment within the same 84-item session, ask the city clerk whether both steps received legally separate public notices.
Caleb Mann RTN District at McShann and Preston Road (Z-25-000121)
City Council final vote
Showing all 5 actions. Filter by: , , , , .
Calculate protest threshold for McShann-Preston rezoning case
Why now: Six City Plan Commission appearances all carried unanimously (10-0, 12-0, 14-0, 14-0), signaling Council scheduling is likely imminent after the June 11 session.
What to do: Pull ownership records for parcels within 200 feet of the Residential Transition Neighborhood boundary and calculate whether the 20% acreage threshold for a written protest can be met — meeting it forces a three-quarters supermajority vote at City Council instead of a simple majority.
Act before: After City Council votes on the rezoning ordinance
Compare permitted uses for McShann-Preston rezoning district
Why now: The case has carried unanimously at every one of its six hearings (most recently 10-0 on June 11), but the ordinance hasn't taken effect yet.
What to do: Pull the June 11 staff report and compare the Residential Transition Neighborhood district's permitted uses, setbacks, height, and lot coverage against the corridor's current zoning to see which building types just became feasible. The ordinance effective date — not the commission vote — is what triggers vested rights for any project you want governed by the new rules.
Act before: After ordinance effective date
Investigate unexplained commissioner conflict in McShann-Preston rezoning case
Why now: Minutes show Hampton recused 'due to conflict of interest' and left the room for both the April 23 vote (12-0) and the June 11 vote (10-0), with the underlying conflict still undisclosed.
What to do: File a public records request for Commissioner Hampton's conflict-of-interest disclosure form and any application materials explaining the private-individual case name — Hampton has now recused from this same case twice, at separate hearings months apart, with no disclosure on file either time.
Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)
Brief district council member on McShann-Preston rezoning
Why now: Votes of 10-0, 12-0, 14-0, and 14-0 across six appearances show a commission with no internal opposition left to leverage before the case reaches Council.
What to do: Identify the City Council member for the McShann-Preston corridor and request a meeting now — this was the case's sixth appearance before the commission and its fourth straight unanimous carry, meaning a formal recommendation may already be moving toward the next posted council docket.
Act before: After matter appears on City Council docket
Check if your McShann-Preston block is in rezoning boundary
Why now: The case has carried unanimously six times running, most recently 10-0 on June 11, with no indication of a further public hearing before Council adoption.
What to do: Download the application packet from the June 11 City Plan Commission agenda and verify whether your parcel sits inside the Residential Transition Neighborhood boundary — that designation can allow neighborhood office and limited commercial uses on lots currently zoned single-family.
Act before: After City Council adopts the rezoning ordinance
Nueva Vida New Life Assembly Application (Z-25-000060)
Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .
Verify protest-petition supermajority for New Life Assembly corridor rezoning
Context: Item 9 (Z-25-000060) carried 11-0 individually rather than on the June 11 consent agenda, and Texas Local Government Code Ch. 211 requires a 3/4 council vote when a valid protest petition exists.
Recommended: Pull the June 24 City Council minutes to confirm whether the ordinance passed by simple majority or required the three-fourths supermajority Texas law mandates when a valid protest petition is on file — Item 9 was pulled for individual consideration at the June 11 Plan Commission rather than riding the consent agenda, a common signal that an adjacent owner filed a protest. If a protest was filed but the wrong voting threshold was applied, the approval is vulnerable to challenge.
Ask why corridor church zoning case skipped consent agenda
Context: Z-25-000060 was heard individually on June 11 while 30 of the 40 zoning cases on the same docket carried staff-approval recommendations and moved on consent, yet it still carried 11-0 before Council adopted it June 24.
Recommended: Request the Plan Commission's agenda backup for Item 9 to identify who asked for it to be pulled from consent — staff, the applicant, or a nearby property owner — since unanimous votes rarely need individual hearings absent an objection first.
Unity of Dallas Application (Z-25-000023)
Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .
Verify Unity of Dallas ordinance matches CPC conditions
Context: This case cleared a June 11 agenda carrying 40 zoning cases (30 with staff-approval recommendations) before City Council adopted it unanimously, 11-0, on June 24.
Recommended: Pull the signed ordinance and compare it against the City Plan Commission's recommended conditions from June 11 — on a docket with 40 zoning cases moving through the same day, transcription mismatches between committee conditions and the final adopted ordinance are a real risk, and this ordinance is now the binding, enforceable document.
Check if Unity of Dallas got individual CPC review
Context: The June 11 City Plan Commission agenda had 84 substantive items led by a 40-case zoning docket, 30 of which carried staff recommendations for approval, before this matter went to a unanimous 11-0 Council vote.
Recommended: File a records request for the staff report and CPC discussion notes to find out whether this case drew individual commissioner scrutiny or was swept through as one of the 30 staff-recommended approvals on a 40-case docket — a useful data point for a story on how much review high-volume zoning days actually get.
Analysis
Zoning
Planning
Subdivisions
Historic Preservation
Infrastructure & Facilities
Community Impact
Housing
Governance & Oversight
Key Decisions
Insights by Role
Developer
HighHigh significance — major decision, large financial impact, or broad community effectJune 11 is a high-volume development docket: the two largest subdivision plats — a 296-lot small-lot project at Haymarket Road and an 81-lot infill on Kiest Boulevard — are scheduled for potential approval, and the Commission's handling of the long-deferred McShann/Preston RTN case will signal current tolerance for residential transition zoning at single-family edges in District 13.
Journalist
HighHigh significance — major decision, large financial impact, or broad community effectThree storylines on the June 11 agenda are worth reporting: a citywide code change that would permit tattoo and body piercing studios in form-based districts for the first time, a street renaming where staff and the Subdivision Review Committee are split, and a zoning case that has been deferred five times despite consistent staff approval recommendations — each raising questions the Commission vote may or may not resolve.
Lobbyist
MediumMedium significance — notable action worth trackingThe June 11 agenda includes three governance-level items where Commission action creates a durable regulatory record: the citywide form-based district code amendment on tattoo and body piercing (item #22) and two street renaming applications with divergent committee outcomes (items #33 and #34). The code amendment in particular is a permanent citywide policy change that industry and neighborhood stakeholders may want to be on record supporting or opposing before the vote.
Resident
MediumMedium significance — notable action worth trackingResidents in at least six council districts have items directly affecting their neighborhoods on June 11, including a fifth hearing on the contested McShann/Preston zoning case in District 13, two large residential subdivisions in Districts 3 and 8, new community facilities proposed in Districts 4, 5, and 11, and a street renaming in District 4 where the Subdivision Review Committee has recommended denial.
Charts & Data
85 items(76 procedural hidden)
(e.g., Approved, Denied, Held)
AI-generated summaries. Click to expand for original text.
#1An application for a minor amendment to the development plan within Planned Development District No. 468 (WMU-8 zoning) bounded by N. Zang Boulevard, West 6th Street, and N. Beckley Avenue in the Bishop Arts area, with staff recommending approval.
#2Application for a Specific Use Permit for a temporary concrete batching plant on MU-2 zoned property near E. Wheatland Road and S. Lancaster Road; staff recommends approval through January 1, 2028, or until the associated infrastructure project is complete.
#3Application for a new Specific Use Permit to allow an accessory private community center within Planned Development District No. 388 with the Tenth Street Historic Overlay on E. 10th Street, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#4Application for a new Specific Use Permit to establish a community service center on R-16(A) Single Family District property along LBJ Freeway east of Copenhill Road; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#1An application for a minor amendment to the development plan within Planned Development District No. 468 (Subdistrict O, WMU-8), bounded by North Zang Boulevard, West 6th Street, and North Beckley Avenue, with staff recommending approval.
#5Application to rezone property to Neighborhood Office District and terminate an existing Specific Use Permit for a branch library on Royal Lane between Netherland Drive and Royal Way; staff recommends approval.
#6Application to expand Subdistrict 1H within Planned Development District No. 714 (West Commerce Street/Fort Worth Avenue Special Purpose District) on W. Main Street west of N. Beckley Avenue; staff recommends approval.
#7Application for a new Specific Use Permit to allow a self-service storage facility within Planned Development No. 887 (Valley View - Galleria Area Special Purpose District) at the northwest corner of Montfort Drive and Valley View Trail; staff recommends approval for a 30-year period with automatic 10-year renewal eligibility.
#8Application for a new Specific Use Permit for a private school on R-16(A) Single Family District property on the north line of Forest Lane west of Hillcrest Road; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan, traffic management plan, and conditions.
#9Application for a new Specific Use Permit for an open-enrollment charter school on R-7.5(A) Single Family District property on the west line of Cheyenne Road south of Rockingham Street; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan, traffic management plan, and conditions.
#10Application for a new Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a restaurant (no drive-in or drive-through) on CR Community Retail District property with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay on Peavy Road northwest of Garland Road; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#11Application to amend Planned Development District No. 17 at the southeast corner of Alpha Road and Preston Road, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#12Application for a new Specific Use Permit to allow alcoholic beverage sales at a general merchandise or food store greater than 3,500 square feet within Planned Development No. 366 on S. Buckner Boulevard, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#13Application to amend Specific Use Permit No. 2424 for a cellular communication tower/antenna on property between Pleasant Drive and Baywood Drive, with staff recommending approval for a ten-year period with automatic renewal eligibility.
#14Application to amend Specific Use Permit No. 2500 for the sale of alcoholic beverages at a general merchandise or food store of 3,500 square feet or less on North Buckner Boulevard, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#15Application to establish a new LC Light Commercial subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 193 at the south corner of Lemmon Avenue and Hedgerow Drive; staff recommends approval subject to a development plan, landscape plan, and conditions.
#16Application to create a new IR Industrial Research subdistrict within Planned Development No. 307 on the west line of Ford Road south of Christian Pkwy; staff recommends approval subject to a development plan, landscape plan, and conditions.
#17Application, under advisement from May 7, 2026, to rezone property from IR Industrial Research District to WMU-5 Walkable Urban Mixed-Use District at the south corner of Empire Central Drive and Forest Park Road; staff recommends approval.
#18Application, under advisement from April 9, 2026, to rezone property from A(A) Agricultural District to LI Light Industrial District on the south line of Telephone Road east of N. Dallas Avenue; staff recommends approval.
#19Application to rezone property from Agricultural District to a new Planned Development District for Light Industrial uses on Cleveland Road, west of Lancaster-Hutchins Road. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions; the case was under advisement from May 7, 2026.
#20Application to rezone a corner property at McShann Road and Preston Road from R-16(A) Single Family District to RTN Residential Transition District. Staff recommends approval; the case has been under advisement since February 2026.
#21Application for a Specific Use Permit to allow a private recreation club or area on property in Planned Development District No. 160 at W. Canty Street and N. Vernon Avenue. Staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#22Proposed amendment to Dallas City Code Section 51A-13.306 to reclassify tattoo and body piercing establishments as permitted (rather than prohibited) personal service uses in form-based zoning districts. Both ZOAC and staff recommend approval.
#23Application to create one 0.5710-acre lot from a tract in City Block 6114 on Illinois Avenue, east of Cockrell Hill Road, under RR zoning in Council District 3. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions listed in the docket.
#24Application by QT South, LLC to replat a 2.2260-acre tract in City Blocks 6983 and 6114 to create one lot at the southeast corner of Illinois Avenue and Cockrell Hill Road, under RR zoning in Council District 3. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#25Application by Ken Murchison to replat a 1.363-acre tract on Timberline Drive north of Northwest Highway into two lots (0.614 acres and 0.739 acres) under CR zoning in Council District 6. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#26Application by the City of Dallas to replat a 3.746-acre tract on Highland Road northwest of Ferguson Road to create one lot under MF-2(A) multifamily zoning in Council District 2. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#27Application to replat a 0.1143-acre tract combining Lots 8E and 8F in City Block 4/699 into a single lot on Virginia Avenue, northeast of Annex Avenue; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#28Application to create a 296-lot small lots residential development (SB15) with 3 common areas from a 49.99-acre tract on Haymarket Road, west of Jordan Valley Road; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#1Application for a minor amendment to the development plan for a property zoned WMU-8 within Planned Development District No. 468, bounded by North Zang Boulevard, West 6th Street, and North Beckley Avenue; staff recommends approval.
#29Application to create a single 0.228-acre lot from a tract in City Block 5830 at the southwest corner of Military Parkway and McNeil Street; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#2Application for a Specific Use Permit for a temporary concrete batching plant on MU-2 zoned property on E. Wheatland Road, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions with an expiration of January 1, 2028 or completion of the associated infrastructure project.
#30Application to create an 81-lot residential subdivision with 5 common areas and a private street dedication from a 5.166-acre tract on Kiest Boulevard at Los Angeles Boulevard; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#3Application for a Specific Use Permit for a private accessory community center on property within Planned Development District No. 388 with the Tenth Street Historic Overlay on E. 10th Street, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#31Application to create 16 residential lots ranging from 7,767 to 10,824 square feet from a 4.109-acre tract on Pemberton Hill Road north of Jeane Street, zoned R-7.5(A), with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#4Application for a new Specific Use Permit to operate a community service center on R-16(A) Single Family District property near LBJ Freeway and Copenhill Road, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#5Zoning application to rezone property to NO(A) Neighborhood Office District and terminate Specific Use Permit 45 for a branch library on the south line of Royal Lane in Council District 13. Staff recommends approval.
#6Zoning application by Trinity Park Conservancy to expand Subdistrict 1H within Planned Development District No. 714 on the north line of W. Main Street west of N. Beckley Avenue in Council District 6. Staff recommends approval.
#32Application to replat a 0.500-acre lot (Lot 7, City Block G/6855) between 55th and 56th Streets east of Veterans Drive into two equal 0.250-acre lots, zoned R-5(A), with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#7An application for a new Specific Use Permit for a self-service storage facility within Planned Development 887 (Valley View – Galleria Area Special Purpose District), with staff recommending 30-year approval and eligibility for automatic 10-year renewals.
#8Application for a new Specific Use Permit for a private school on R-16(A) zoned property on Forest Lane west of Hillcrest Road in Council District 11, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan, traffic management plan, and conditions.
#33Application to rename Woodbine Avenue between Morrell Avenue and Renner Road to 'Dr. David Henderson Jr. Avenue,' with staff recommending approval but the Subdivision Review Committee recommending denial.
#9Application for a new Specific Use Permit for an open-enrollment charter school on R-7.5(A) zoned property on Cheyenne Road south of Rockingham Street in Council District 5, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan, traffic management plan, and conditions.
#34Application to rename the east-west segment of Davenport Road between Preston Road and the north-south Davenport Road to 'Brentfield Drive,' with both staff and the Subdivision Review Committee recommending approval.
#10Application for a new Specific Use Permit to allow alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with a restaurant (no drive-in/drive-through) on CR-zoned property with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay on the southwest line of Peavy Road near Garland Road; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#11Application to amend Planned Development District No. 17 at the southeast corner of Alpha Road and Preston Road; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#12Application for a new Specific Use Permit (Z-26-000037) to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a general merchandise or food store greater than 3,500 sq ft on S. Buckner Boulevard within Planned Development No. 366. Staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#35Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 92-square-foot LED illuminated detached sign at 2508 Maple Ave., with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#13Application to amend Specific Use Permit No. 2424 (Z-26-000078) for a cellular communication tower/antenna on R-7.5(A) and CR-zoned property between Pleasant Drive and Baywood Drive. Staff recommends approval for a ten-year period with eligibility for automatic ten-year renewals.
#36Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on the northeast elevation of 2121 N. Pearl St., with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#14Application to amend Specific Use Permit No. 2500 to allow the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a general merchandise or food store of 3,500 square feet or less on North Buckner Boulevard, within an RR Regional Retail District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#37Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on the southwest elevation of 2121 N. Pearl St., with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#15Application to establish a new LC Light Commercial Subdistrict within Planned Development District No. 193 at the corner of Lemmon Avenue and Hedgerow Drive for Extra Space Storage. Staff recommends approval subject to a development plan, landscape plan, and conditions.
#16An application by Gedalia Inc. to establish a new Industrial Research (IR) subdistrict within Planned Development No. 307 on the west line of Ford Road south of Christian Pkwy, with staff recommending approval subject to a development plan, landscape plan, and conditions.
#17Zoning application to rezone a property at the south corner of Empire Central Drive and Forest Park Road from IR Industrial Research District to WMU-5 Walkable Urban Mixed-Use District, under advisement from May 7, 2026. Staff recommends approval.
#18Zoning application to rezone a property on the south line of Telephone Road east of N. Dallas Avenue from A(A) Agricultural District to LI Light Industrial District, under advisement from April 9, 2026. Staff recommends approval.
#19Zoning application to create a new planned development district for Light Industrial uses on property zoned A(A) Agricultural District on the south line of Cleveland Road west of Lancaster-Hutchins Road, under advisement from May 7, 2026. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#20Zoning application to rezone a property at the northwest corner of McShann Road and Preston Road from R-16(A) Single Family District to RTN Residential Transition District, under advisement multiple times since February 2026. Staff recommends approval.
CITY PLAN COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMITTEE MEETINGS Tuesday, June 9, 2026 SPECIAL SIGN DISTRICT ADVISORY COMMITTEE (SSDAC) MEETING Tuesday, June 9, 2026, at 10:00 a.m., in Room 5BN at City Hall and by vide
#21Application for a new Specific Use Permit to operate a private recreation club or area on Planned Development District No. 160 property at the corners of W. Canty Street and N. Vernon Avenue; staff recommends approval with conditions.
#22Proposed amendment to Dallas City Code Section 51A-13.306 to reclassify 'Tattoo and body piercing' from a prohibited to a permitted personal service use in form-based zoning districts; both ZOAC and staff recommend approval.
#23Application to create a single 0.5710-acre lot from a tract in City Block 6114 on Illinois Avenue east of Cockrell Hill Road; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#24Application by QT South, LLC to replat a 2.2260-acre tract spanning portions of City Blocks 6983 and 6114 into one lot at the southeast corner of Illinois Avenue and Cockrell Hill Road; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#25Application to replat a 1.363-acre tract on Timberline Drive, north of Northwest Highway, splitting Lot 14B into two lots of 0.614 and 0.739 acres; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#26Application by the City of Dallas to replat a 3.746-acre tract on Highland Road, northwest of Ferguson Road, consolidating portions of City Block 7037 into a single lot; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#27Application to replat Lots 8E and 8F in City Block 4/699 into a single lot on Virginia Avenue, northeast of Annex Avenue, within an MF-2(A) zoning district. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#28Application to create a 296-lot Small Lots SB15 subdivision with 3 common areas from a 49.99-acre tract on Haymarket Road, west of Jordan Valley Road, zoned AA. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#29Plat application (PLAT-26-000128) to create a single 0.228-acre lot at the southwest corner of Military Parkway and McNeil Street in City Block 5830, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#30Plat application (PLAT-26-000129) by Udaan Capital, LLC to subdivide a 5.166-acre tract on Kiest Boulevard into 81 residential lots with 5 common areas and a private street dedication, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#31Application to subdivide a 4.109-acre tract on Pemberton Hill Road, north of Jeane Street, into 16 residential lots ranging from 7,767 to 10,824 square feet, zoned R-7.5(A), with staff recommending approval subject to docket conditions.
#32Application to replat a single 0.500-acre lot (Lot 7, City Block G/6855) into two equal 0.250-acre lots located between 55th and 56th Streets east of Veterans Drive, zoned R-5(A), with staff recommending approval subject to docket conditions.
#33Application to rename Woodbine Avenue between Morrell Avenue and Renner Road to 'Dr. David Henderson Jr. Avenue.' Staff recommends approval, but the Subdivision Review Committee recommends denial.
#34Application to rename the east-west segment of Davenport Road between Preston Road and Davenport Road (north-south) to 'Brentfield Drive,' with both staff and the Subdivision Review Committee recommending approval.
#35Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 92-square-foot LED illuminated detached sign at 2508 Maple Ave, submitted by Curt Horak of Priority Signs on behalf of owner Pasha & Sina Inc; both staff and SSDAC recommend approval.
#36Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on an aluminum frame at 2121 N Pearl St (northeast elevation); both staff and SSDAC recommend approval.
#37Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on an aluminum frame at 2121 N Pearl St (southwest elevation); both staff and SSDAC recommend approval.
#35A Certificate of Appropriateness application to install a 92-square-foot LED illuminated detached sign at 2508 Maple Ave (Southeast Corner), with both staff and the SSDAC recommending approval.
#36A Certificate of Appropriateness application to install a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on an aluminum frame at 2121 N Pearl St (Northeast Elevation), with both staff and the SSDAC recommending approval.
#37Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on the southwest elevation of 2121 N Pearl St, recommended for approval by both staff and SSDAC.
#35Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 92-square-foot LED illuminated detached sign at 2508 Maple Ave (southeast corner), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#36Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on an aluminum frame on the northeast elevation of 2121 N Pearl St, with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#37Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on an aluminum frame on the southwest elevation of 2121 N Pearl St, with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#35Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 92-square-foot LED illuminated detached sign at 2508 Maple Ave (southeast corner), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#36An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on the northeast elevation of 2121 N Pearl St, with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#37An application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 761-square-foot LED illuminated channel letter sign reading 'PWC' with logo on the southwest elevation of 2121 N Pearl St, with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
Municue is in beta
We're building the most comprehensive municipal intelligence platform. Your feedback shapes what we build next.