Taylor Madison Application

Context: The May 21 vote record for Item 12 carries an explicit asterisk: '*Kocks out of room, shown voting in favor,' creating a direct conflict between the recorded 14-0 vote and the commissioner's documented absence from the room.

Recommended: Request the certified May 21 City Plan Commission minutes now and compare the official roll-call record against the asterisked note that Commissioner Kocks was out of the room but shown voting in favor — if the 14-0 count includes Kocks in error, the May 21 action is procedurally defective, and any future commission action that treats it as a valid prior record could be challenged on that basis.

Context: The matter logged two separate entries for June 11 and still shows 'next step: Unknown' as of June 18, 2026, despite a 14-0 carry at the May 21 hearing (Item 12, Z-26-000032).

Recommended: Call City Plan Commission staff today to confirm what action was taken at the June 11 hearing and when this case is next calendared — after three appearances including a unanimous 14-0 carry on May 21, the absence of a declared next step as of June 18 suggests the case was passed over or deferred again without notice on an 84-item agenda. A fourth unscheduled appearance adds months to your entitlement timeline.

Context: This case appeared twice on the June 11 agenda after a 14-0 carry on May 21, yet shows no declared next step as of June 18 — a pattern across three appearances that suggests a procedural miss on a heavy agenda rather than substantive commission opposition.

Recommended: Request the June 11 City Plan Commission minutes and compare them against this case's dual agenda listing — if the commission took no action on June 11 despite the application appearing twice on an 84-item agenda after a 14-0 preliminary vote, ask staff whether the double-listing caused this case to be skipped, and whether the same thing happened to any of the other four under-advisement cases (#17–#21) on that same session.