Which government bodies are involved in Zoning Case File 26-2035A?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Plan Commission.

When was Zoning Case File 26-2035A first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00.

Zoning Case File 26-2035A

Q: What is the current status of An application to replat a 2.2260-acre tract of land containing part of Lot D in City Block 3/6983, part of City Blocks 6983 and 6114 to create one lot on property located on Illinois Avenue at Cockrell Hill Road, southeast corner. Applicant/Owner: QT South, LLC Surveyor: Kimley-Horn and Assoc. Inc. Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: RR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 3 PLAT-26-000116?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Plan Commission.

View full legal title

An application to replat a 2.2260-acre tract of land containing part of Lot D in City Block 3/6983, part of City Blocks 6983 and 6114 to create one lot on property located on Illinois Avenue at Cockrell Hill Road, southeast corner. Applicant/Owner: QT South, LLC Surveyor: Kimley-Horn and Assoc. Inc. Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: RR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 3 PLAT-26-000116

active

Zoning CasecorridorNotableCity Plan CommissionDistrict 3

QT South, LLC is proposing to replat a 2.2-acre property at the southeast corner of Illinois Avenue and Cockrell Hill Road, combining multiple lots into a single lot. The replat would consolidate the property boundaries, which may enable future development or changes to how the site is used.

2 eventsFirst seen Jun 11, 2026Last activity Jun 11, 2026File #: 26-2035A

Topics

development

permit

zoning

Illinois Avenue and Cockrell Hill Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Confirm whether June 11 vote closed corridor zoning case

Why now: The June 11 minutes for Case 26-2035A record a 9-0 carried vote on Item 24, yet this two-appearance matter still lists no next procedural step.

What to do: Pull the minutes for Item 24 to see whether the Commission's 9-0 vote approved, denied, or continued the case — if it was a final recommendation, the appeal window to City Council may already be running while the matter's next-step status still shows unknown.

Act before: After statutory challenge period expires

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Journalist

Request minutes language behind 9-0 corridor zoning vote

Why now: Item 24 for Case 26-2035A carried 9-0 on June 11, the same day the case held two non-routine agenda slots, yet the matter's next step remains unrecorded.

What to do: File a records request for the exact motion language behind the 9-0 vote on Item 24, then compare it to the case's still-unknown next step to determine whether the commission actually resolved the case or voted to continue it again.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Lobbyist

Shift corridor zoning lobbying from commission to city council

Why now: The Commission carried Item 24 for Case 26-2035A 9-0 on June 11 after the case occupied two non-routine slots that day, a pattern consistent with a forwarded recommendation.

What to do: If the 9-0 vote on Item 24 was a recommendation rather than another continuance, this case is likely headed to City Council next — start identifying and briefing the council office covering the corridor now, before the case is scheduled and your commission-side relationships become moot.

Act before: After the case is placed on a City Council agenda

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →