Which government bodies are involved in Zoning Case File 26-2036A?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Plan Commission.

When was Zoning Case File 26-2036A first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00.

Zoning Case File 26-2036A

Q: What is the current status of An application to replat a 1.363-acre tract of land containing all of Lot 14B in City Block 7/5775 to create one 0.614-acre lot and one 0.739-acre lot on property located on Timberline Drive, north of Northwest Highway. Applicant/Owner: Ken Murchison Surveyor: USA Engineers, Inc. Application Filed: May 13, 2026 Zoning: CR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 6 PLAT-26-000119?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Plan Commission.

View full legal title

An application to replat a 1.363-acre tract of land containing all of Lot 14B in City Block 7/5775 to create one 0.614-acre lot and one 0.739-acre lot on property located on Timberline Drive, north of Northwest Highway. Applicant/Owner: Ken Murchison Surveyor: USA Engineers, Inc. Application Filed: May 13, 2026 Zoning: CR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 6 PLAT-26-000119

active

Zoning Casesite_specificCity Plan CommissionDistrict 6

Ken Murchison is seeking to replat a 1.363-acre property on Timberline Drive, north of Northwest Highway, dividing it into two smaller lots of 0.614 and 0.739 acres. This subdivision would reconfigure the land into two separate parcels that could be developed or used independently.

2 eventsFirst seen Jun 11, 2026Last activity Jun 11, 2026File #: 26-2036A

Topics

development

permit

zoning

Timberline Drive·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Verify Dallas zoning vote date before appeal deadline

Why now: Item 25 carried 9-0 on June 11, but the case appeared as two separate agenda entries that day with no explanation for the duplication.

What to do: Pull the City Plan Commission's June 11 action sheet to confirm which of the two agenda entries controls — the case carried 9-0, but the duplicate listing leaves the exact vote date ambiguous, and Texas's writ of certiorari challenge window can run as short as 10 days from that date.

Act before: After statutory challenge period expires

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Journalist

Ask why Dallas zoning case listed twice on agenda

Why now: The case shows two June 11 appearances but only one recorded disposition (Item 25, carried 9-0), with no public explanation for the duplication.

What to do: Ask the City Plan Commission clerk why the case appeared as two separate entries on the June 11 agenda when only a single vote — Item 25, carried 9-0 — shows up in the minutes. In a session that bundled 84 substantive items including a 40-case zoning docket, an unexplained duplicate entry is worth checking for a clerical error or an unrecorded companion action.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Lobbyist

Target Council before Dallas zoning case hits consent agenda

Why now: Item 25 carried 9-0 on June 11, a unanimous recommendation that will make any later pull-from-consent request at Council far harder to win.

What to do: The case carried 9-0 at the City Plan Commission on June 11, so expect it on City Council's zoning consent agenda within 2–4 weeks — with a unanimous recommendation already on record, the realistic window to raise concerns or request a pull from consent closes at the City Secretary's posting deadline, typically the Thursday before the Tuesday Council meeting.

Act before: After matter appears on City Council agenda

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →