Which government bodies are involved in John Falb / Gilliland Properties II, LLC Application (Z-26-000079)?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Plan Commission.

When was John Falb / Gilliland Properties II, LLC Application (Z-26-000079) first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00.

John Falb / Gilliland Properties II, LLC Application

Q: What is the current status of An application for an amendment to Planned Development District No. 17, on the southeast corner of Alpha Road and Preston Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: John Falb / Gilliland Properties II, LLC Representative: Rob Baldwin / Baldwin Associates, LLC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 11 Z-26-000079?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Plan Commission.

View full legal title

An application for an amendment to Planned Development District No. 17, on the southeast corner of Alpha Road and Preston Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: John Falb / Gilliland Properties II, LLC Representative: Rob Baldwin / Baldwin Associates, LLC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 11 Z-26-000079

active

Zoning CasecorridorNotableCity Plan CommissionDistrict 11

Gilliland Properties II, LLC is proposing an amendment to Planned Development District No. 17 at the southeast corner of Alpha Road and Preston Road. The amendment will modify land use and development requirements for the property, subject to conditions set by city staff.

2 eventsFirst seen Jun 11, 2026Last activity Jun 11, 2026Case ID: Z-26-000079

Topics

development

public_hearing

zoning

Alpha Road and Preston Road·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Check for a protest petition against the Gilliland corridor rezoning

Why now: City Plan Commission approved Z-26-000079 11-0 on June 11, but that vote only sends a recommendation forward, and a protest petition changes what Council needs to pass it.

What to do: Confirm whether any adjacent property owner filed a valid protest petition before this reaches City Council — a valid petition raises the approval threshold from a simple majority to a three-fourths supermajority, even after a unanimous Commission vote.

Act before: After City Council votes on Z-26-000079

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Developer

Pull the written conditions from the Gilliland corridor rezoning vote

Why now: Z-26-000079 has only two entries on record, both dated June 11 (the hearing and the 11-0 vote), with no prior deferral, so whatever conditions were read that day are the only ones on file to verify.

What to do: Before ordering engineering drawings or starting site design, request the written conditions read into the record at the June 11 vote — verbal conditions attached at approval often differ from what ends up in the final Council ordinance.

Act before: After City Council adopts the final ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Lobbyist

Identify the council member for the Gilliland corridor rezoning

Why now: Z-26-000079 passed City Plan Commission 11-0 on June 11 with no recorded dissent, leaving Council as the sole remaining venue.

What to do: With the Commission vote unanimous, the only remaining decision point is City Council — find the district council office covering this corridor and brief them now, since a late-filed protest petition could still force a four-vote supermajority they'll need to be ready for.

Act before: After City Council votes on Z-26-000079

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →