Zoning Case File 26-2038A

Context: This case appears twice in the June 11 timeline under the same body with no recorded outcome as of June 18, creating genuine ambiguity about whether a vote occurred and a challenge clock is already running without your client's knowledge.

Recommended: Contact the City Plan Commission clerk today to confirm whether Case 26-2038A was voted on or continued on June 11 — if a vote occurred, the statutory challenge period began that date and may already be more than half elapsed with no protective filing in place.

Context: Case 26-2038A has two separate June 11 City Plan Commission timeline entries and no recorded outcome as of June 18, making it the only corridor-scope case among the 10 non-routine under-advisement items without a known result seven days after the hearing.

Recommended: File a records request for the June 11 City Plan Commission verbatim minutes and meeting video for this case — a single zoning item appearing twice on the same agenda may indicate a floor motion was withdrawn and re-opened, a vote failed and was immediately reconsidered, or a procedural restart occurred, none of which would appear in the published agenda.

Context: This corridor zoning case appeared twice in the June 11 session and still shows no recorded next step as of June 18, and on an 84-item docket where under-advisement items receive minimal floor time, commissioners' pre-meeting positions are the only ones that matter.

Recommended: Contact the City Plan Commission clerk today to determine whether this case was voted on, continued, or withdrawn on June 11 — if it was continued again, the window to brief commissioners before the next hearing is open right now, before the next agenda is published and scheduling locks.