Which government bodies are involved in Military Parkway at McNeil Street (File 26-2040A)?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Plan Commission.

When was Military Parkway at McNeil Street (File 26-2040A) first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00.

Military Parkway at McNeil Street (File 26-2040A)

Q: What is the current status of An application to create one 0.228-acre lot from a tract of land in City Block 5830 on property located on Military Parkway at McNeil Street, southwest corner. Applicant/Owners: Jose Carmen Servin and Ma Elia Servin Surveyor: ARA Surveying Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: CR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 5 PLAT-26-000128?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-06-11 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Plan Commission.

View full legal title

An application to create one 0.228-acre lot from a tract of land in City Block 5830 on property located on Military Parkway at McNeil Street, southwest corner. Applicant/Owners: Jose Carmen Servin and Ma Elia Servin Surveyor: ARA Surveying Application Filed: May 14, 2026 Zoning: CR Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to compliance with the conditions listed in the docket. Planner: Sharmila Shrestha Council District: 5 PLAT-26-000128

active

Zoning Casesite_specificCity Plan CommissionDistrict 5

Jose Carmen Servin and Ma Elia Servin are applying to subdivide their property at the southwest corner of Military Parkway and McNeil Street, creating a 0.228-acre lot from a larger parcel in City Block 5830. The property is zoned for commercial and retail use, and the subdivision would allow the owners to separate the lot for future development or sale.

2 eventsFirst seen Jun 11, 2026Last activity Jun 11, 2026File #: 26-2040A

Topics

development

permit

zoning

Military Parkway and McNeil Street·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Check for protest petitions before Council vote on Military Parkway rezoning

Why now: Item 29 carried 9-0 on June 11 and the record shows the case now advances to City Council for final vote.

What to do: File 26-2040A carried the City Plan Commission 9-0, but a valid written protest from adjacent property owners can still force a three-fourths supermajority vote at City Council regardless of that unanimous recommendation. Pull the protest log before the case is calendared so you know which vote threshold Council must clear.

Act before: After City Council votes on the rezoning ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Developer

Pull the Commission's written conditions before Council calendars the case

Why now: Item 29 carried 9-0 on June 11 and next advances to City Council for a final vote.

What to do: The 9-0 recommendation on June 11 is the version Council will vote on with little change unless a protest is filed, so get the certified recommendation and any attached conditions now and check them against your site plan before the ordinance is calendared.

Act before: After City Council votes on the rezoning ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →

Journalist

Confirm why Military Parkway rezoning is listed twice on one agenda

Why now: The matter's record shows two June 11 City Plan Commission entries for the same file despite one 9-0 outcome on Item 29.

What to do: Pull the full June 11 City Plan Commission agenda and compare both entries for 26-2040A — since the case resolved as a single 9-0 vote, check whether the second listing was a companion plat filed separately or a clerical duplicate before the case reaches Council.

Act before: After City Council votes on the rezoning ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Jun 11, 2026 →