Municue

Multifamily Development at Worth Street and Peak Street

View full legal title

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Representative: Tommy Mann U/A From: January 15, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

active
Zoning Casesite_specificSignificantCity Council, City Plan Commission
A proposal to rezone the corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street to allow multifamily residential development, currently restricted to single-family homes. This change would enable apartment and multi-unit housing on this corner, requiring submission of detailed development and façade plans meeting city conditions.
5 eventsFirst seen Aug 7, 2025Last activity Apr 8, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000015
Worth Street and North Peak Street·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney

Pull Kingston conflict disclosure before Worth Street Council vote

Why now: The August 7 City Plan Commission minutes for Item 29 note Kingston listed as Conflict and removed from the room during a 13-0 vote, with a recess logged from 3:33 to 3:45 p.m., but do not identify the nature of the conflict.

What to do: If you represent any party with standing on this case, confirm that the written conflict disclosure form for Commissioner Kingston is in the official case file before tomorrow's City Council vote — a gap in that record is the most likely procedural hook for a post-adoption challenge.

Act before: After ordinance adopted at City Council

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →
Developer

Confirm April 8 City Council will vote on Worth Street rezoning

Why now: Z-25-000015 has logged 5 appearances since August 2025, including two consecutive City Council dates (March 25 and April 8), with no final vote on record for either.

What to do: This case appeared on the March 25 City Council agenda without producing a recorded final vote, making April 8 a second Council hearing. Verify with your Council liaison today that the item is set for a vote — not another postponement — so you can activate construction financing the moment the ordinance passes.

Act before: After April 8 City Council vote

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →
Journalist

Request postponement records for Worth Street apartment rezoning

Why now: This case appeared at City Plan Commission on August 7, January 15, and February 5 — all unanimous carries — then twice at City Council (March 25 and April 8) without a final vote, an 8-month arc with no recorded opposition and an unexplained conflict for Commissioner Kingston whose relationship to this applicant is not in the public-facing minutes.

What to do: File an open records request for all applicant postponement letters and staff-applicant correspondence on this case: a rezoning carried unanimously three times at City Plan Commission and heard twice at City Council without a recorded vote is unusual, and the August 7 record documents an undisclosed commissioner conflict with a named individual.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →
Resident

Ask what changed after March 25 Worth Street rezoning hearing

Why now: This multifamily rezoning at Worth Street and Peak Street cleared City Plan Commission unanimously three times before reaching Council, and the Council heard it on March 25 without voting, suggesting unresolved terms that could alter the final development's scale or design.

What to do: Before tomorrow's vote, call or email the district Council member's office to ask what caused the March 25 continuance — a second Council hearing on a zoning case frequently means conditions, building heights, or setbacks were renegotiated after the public record closed, and those changes may not appear in the posted agenda.

Act before: After April 8 City Council vote

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →

Timeline

Hearing
Agenda Ready

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Z234-354(MB)/Z-25-000015 Note: This item was deferred by the City Council at the public hearing on March 25, 2026, and is scheduled for consideration on April 8, 2026. *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Hearing
Hearing Open; Deferred

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Z234-354/Z-25-000015 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Representative: Tommy Mann U/A From: January 15, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of new PD for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses with conditions: Group Residential Facility prohibited, 20% facade transparency, tandem parking rules, no parking fees

Kingston listed as Conflict — out of room when vote was taken (not counted in for/against/absent). Commission recessed at 3:33 p.m. and reconvened at 3:45 p.m.

Vote
Carried: 14 to 0

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

Vote: 14 for, 0 against, 1 absent

hold under advisement until February 5, 2026

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a minor amendment to a development plan on property zoned Tract 2 within Planned Development District No. 561 on the north line of Keller Springs Road, west of Preston Road, on the north line of Keller Springs Road, west of Preston Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Herbert Hears Planner: Teaseia Blue, B. Arch, MBA Council District: 12 M234-038(TB) / MZ-25-000015

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of minor amendment to development plan, Tract 2 within PDD 561