City Plan Commission · 9:00 AM · Council Chambers, 6TH Floor
Analysis incorporates data from the official meeting minutes, including vote outcomes, attendance, and public testimony.
Matters
1 contested, 17 unanimous · 9 with voting irregularityVote tally (14) doesn't match named voters (16) — possible absent-member voting irregularity
All Zoning cases
Chernock Townhouse District at North Boulevard Terrace and Plymouth Road (Z-25-000069)
Opposition: Kocks · Coffman
Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .
Request draft ordinance to check re-notification triggers at North Boulevard
Context: The case was held under advisement April 8 and deferred again April 22 across three consecutive Council appearances since the 12-2 City Plan Commission recommendation — a pattern that strongly indicates active condition modification rather than a scheduling hold.
Recommended: Obtain the current draft ordinance from the Dallas City Attorney's office or City Secretary and compare its conditions against the February 5 City Plan Commission approval language — if the Council has materially modified setbacks, unit count, or use restrictions across three hearings, Texas Local Government Code §211.009 notice requirements may have been triggered and a final vote without re-notification would be a procedural defect.
Pull April 8 Council backup to find contested conditions at North Boulevard
Context: The Council deferred twice after the February 5 City Plan Commission 12-2 approval — held under advisement April 8, deferred again April 22 — meaning contested conditions are still being actively negotiated and your project assumptions may no longer match the current draft ordinance.
Recommended: Download the April 8 City Council meeting backup from the Dallas City Secretary's portal and identify what language in the draft ordinance triggered the 'Held Under Advisement' designation — that document will show whether the Council is contesting setbacks, unit count, or design standards your pro forma assumed were finalized at the February City Plan Commission vote.
Request attendance records to investigate the commission vote shift on North Boulevard townhouses
Context: Vote records show a 13-0 City Plan Commission approval in September 2025 followed by a 12-2 approval in February 2026 with Kocks and Coffman specifically named as dissenters, and the Council has since deferred the case three times — the unexplained drop in commission support combined with the Council non-action pattern across five total appearances is the anomaly the public record raises but does not resolve.
Recommended: File a Texas Public Information Act request for the September 4, 2025 City Plan Commission attendance sheet and any revised site plans or applicant submittals filed between September 2025 and February 2026 — determining whether Kocks and Coffman voted yes in September and then flipped, or were simply absent from the unanimous vote, is the key to two materially different stories about why the Council has refused to finalize this case across three appearances despite a positive commission recommendation.
Identify which Council district is blocking the North Boulevard townhouse vote
Context: This case has been deferred or held at Council on March 25, April 8, and April 22 following the February 5 City Plan Commission's 12-2 recommendation, a five-appearance trajectory that places the district Council member's assent — not the full Council — as the critical blocking variable.
Recommended: Determine which Dallas City Council district covers North Boulevard Terrace and Plymouth Road and request a meeting with that Council member's office before the next scheduled hearing — three consecutive deferrals on a case the City Plan Commission recommended 12-2 is a strong signal that the district member has not signaled support, and under Dallas Council protocol that office is the only path to scheduling a final vote.
Regional Retail District at Ferguson Road and Little Pocket Road (Z-25-000001)
City Council final vote
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Verify Herbert's counted vote in Ferguson Road rezoning record
Why now: The published vote record for Z-25-000001 states '*Herbert out of room, shown voting in favor' in the 14-0 February 5, 2026 CPC recommendation, and City Council has since adopted the ordinance in reliance on that tally.
What to do: Pull the February 5, 2026 City Plan Commission minutes and confirm that Herbert was recorded as 'out of room' yet counted in the 14-0 vote that produced the recommendation Council relied on for adoption — if the counted-but-absent vote inflated the tally, assess whether it voids the CPC recommendation and taints the enacted ordinance, then verify the ordinance's exact effective date to determine whether the statutory challenge period remains open.
Act before: After statutory challenge period expires (typically 30 days post-adoption)
Confirm Ferguson Road Regional Retail conditions from February hearing
Why now: Case Z-25-000001 logged four appearances from August 2025 through February 2026, including a remand to CPC after Council closed its hearing — any conditions set at the February 5 session, not the earlier 13-0 vote, govern what can be built.
What to do: Before investing in site plan preparation, pull the conditions of approval attached at the February 5, 2026 City Plan Commission hearing specifically — not the August 2025 originals — because the case's unexplained return to CPC after the Council hearing was already formally closed on December 10, 2025 may mean the district standards or use limitations were modified in that final round.
Act before: After site plan submission
Request records exposing Ferguson Road rezoning's two procedural gaps
Why now: The matter's timeline documents a post-closure remand with no public explanation, and the February 5, 2026 CPC vote record states '*Herbert out of room, shown voting in favor' in the 14-0 tally the Council cited for adoption of Z-25-000001.
What to do: File an open records request for the staff memo or council communication that sent Z-25-000001 back to City Plan Commission on February 5, 2026 after the Council hearing was formally closed December 10, 2025, and separately request the CPC attendance log for that February session — the published vote notes show Herbert counted in a 14-0 approval despite being noted as out of the room, meaning two independent procedural irregularities appear in the same case's record.
Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)
Single Family Reclassification at Peak's Suburban Addition (Z-25-000203)
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Check challenge window on Dallas corridor rezoning vote record
Context: The official Item 18 minutes for the February 5, 2026 City Plan Commission vote explicitly note 'Housewright out of room, shown voting in favor' on the 14-0 recommendation that preceded City Council adoption on April 8, 2026.
Recommended: Pull the February 5 City Plan Commission roll call and meeting audio now to document whether the Housewright vote anomaly constitutes a procedural defect in the record underlying the April 8 Council adoption — if the commission vote is legally infirm, a challenge must be filed before the statutory window closes.
Compare adopted Dallas corridor rezoning text to commission recommendation
Context: This case ran three appearances — a 14-0 City Plan Commission recommendation February 5, an unexplained Council deferral March 25, and final adoption April 8, 2026 — a pattern that frequently reflects condition modifications made between deferral and vote that do not appear in the CPC record.
Recommended: Pull the ordinance adopted April 8 and compare it line-by-line against the February 5 City Plan Commission case file — the unexplained March 25 Council deferral is when use conditions are most commonly renegotiated, and any additions directly limit what is buildable by-right on corridor parcels today.
Request commission video on Dallas corridor rezoning vote anomaly
Context: Item 18 vote notes from February 5, 2026 explicitly flag 'Housewright out of room, shown voting in favor' on the 14-0 tally, and the case was subsequently deferred without explanation at City Council on March 25 before final adoption April 8, 2026.
Recommended: File a public records request for the February 5 City Plan Commission meeting video and roll call — the official minutes record Commissioner Housewright as voting in favor while 'out of room,' and checking whether this notation appears on other items at the same meeting will show whether it is an isolated data entry error or a systemic vote-recording problem.
Deed Restriction Termination at Fouraker Street (Z-25-000202)
City Council final vote
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Verify Fouraker deed termination record before challenge window closes
Applies if: If you represent a party with standing to challenge — a deed restriction beneficiary, neighboring property owner, or civic group
Why now: CPC minutes show Housewright recorded as voting in favor on Feb 5 while noted as out of the room, and Forsyth and Kocks voted against on Mar 5 but the result line reads 'Carried: 12 to 0' — two distinct procedural defects across the only two CPC hearings on Z-25-000202, with no public correction before the April 22 Council vote.
What to do: Request the staff transmittal sent to Council and the April 22 adoption record to determine whether the two CPC vote anomalies — a commissioner recorded as voting while out of the room (Feb 5) and a 12-2 vote entered as a 12-0 result (Mar 5) — were disclosed or corrected before Council acted. If Council adopted on an uncorrected record, the ordinance may be voidable and the statutory challenge window, which opened April 22, is already running.
Act before: After statutory challenge period expires
Pull the deed restriction before Fouraker termination ordinance takes effect
Why now: The termination of deed restriction Z778-18 passed Council on April 22, 2026 after two CPC carries (Feb 5 at 14-0, Mar 5 at 12-2), and the ordinance's effective date — not the Council vote date — is the trigger for permit reliance.
What to do: Request the deed restriction document from Dallas city records now to identify exactly which land use or building constraints lift when the ordinance becomes effective — knowing the full scope before the effective date lets you identify any conditions attached across the two consecutive CPC approval votes and begin permit preparation without waiting on the adoption notice.
Act before: After ordinance effective date
Request Fouraker deed restriction certified minutes to verify two vote errors
Why now: Z-25-000202 shows a commissioner (Housewright) recorded as voting in favor on Feb 5 while noted as out of the room, and a 12-2 vote on Mar 5 where Forsyth and Kocks opposed but the result line reads 'Carried: 12 to 0' — neither anomaly has a documented correction anywhere in the public record.
What to do: File a public records request for certified minutes from both CPC hearings and the Council transmittal, then ask the city clerk whether the Housewright presence anomaly (Feb 5) or the Forsyth-Kocks opposition recorded as a unanimous result (Mar 5) was disclosed or corrected before the April 22 Council vote — two separate recording defects across a three-hearing record with no visible correction is an unusual pattern for a case that carried unanimously on paper.
Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)
Multifamily Planned Development at Worth and North Peak (Z-25-000015)
Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .
Confirm challenge deadline and Kingston conflict for Worth-Peak apartment rezoning
Applies if: Representing parties opposing the rezoning
Context: Kingston was removed from the room during a City Plan Commission vote on Z-25-000015 and the commission formally recessed from 3:33 to 3:45 p.m. specifically to handle the conflict, but Texas Local Government Code §171 requires a written disclosure that should be in the public record and has not been publicly cited.
Recommended: If representing parties opposing this rezoning, confirm the applicable challenge deadline running from the April 8, 2026 ordinance adoption and separately request Commissioner Kingston's written conflict-of-interest disclosure — the recusal is documented in the vote record but the underlying relationship is not stated, which may be material to a procedural challenge.
Cross-check Worth-Peak apartment rezoning ordinance against all planning commission approvals
Context: Z-25-000015 was heard at City Plan Commission three separate times (August 2025, January 2026, February 2026), each hearing a potential opportunity for conditions to be layered or modified before the April 8 City Council adoption.
Recommended: Request the enrolled ordinance from the April 8, 2026 City Council meeting and compare its conditions line-by-line against the staff reports from each of the three City Plan Commission hearings — conditions added or revised across multiple rounds can create compliance gaps that surface only when the building permit application is reviewed.
Pull City Plan Commission staff reports for Worth-Peak apartment rezoning
Context: Z-25-000015 went through three separate City Plan Commission hearings over eight months before stalling at City Council on March 25, 2026 and finally passing April 8 — an unusually long path for a site-specific zoning case that passed unanimously at every stage, with no public explanation of what changed.
Recommended: File a public records request for the staff reports from all three City Plan Commission hearings (August 7, 2025; January 15, 2026; February 5, 2026) and the March 25 City Council agenda item where this case appeared but was not resolved — comparing across five appearances will reveal whether the application was substantively modified between rounds and what drove the two-week Council delay.
Analysis
Zoning
Development & Land Use
Subdivisions
Transportation
Housing
Community Impact
Governance & Oversight
Key Decisions
Insights by Role
Developer
HighHigh significance — major decision, large financial impact, or broad community effectThree active under-advisement cases on the West Davis corridor and at Worth/Peak Streets represent unresolved residential-to-planned-development proceedings that could move at any commission meeting, while five staff-recommended PD and mixed-use applications signal continued approval appetite for density conversions across Council Districts 4, 7, and 11.
Resident
HighHigh significance — major decision, large financial impact, or broad community effectResidents in Council Districts 1, 2, 4, and 6 face the most direct near-term land use changes: three under-advisement rezoning cases on the West Davis Street corridor and at Worth/Peak Streets remain unresolved and could return at the next hearing, while approved staff recommendations in CD4 and CD6 will bring new mixed-use and townhouse density to parcels currently zoned for single-family or multifamily use.
Charts & Data
55 items(28 procedural hidden)
(e.g., Approved, Denied, Held)
AI-generated summaries. Click to expand for original text.
DART Briefing on City of Dallas Transit Orientation Development (TOD) Randall Park Patrick Kennedy Caitlan Holland
#1Application requesting relief from street frontage requirements along Corinth Street per site plan in Planned Development District 317 (Cedars Area Special Purpose District) at the northwest corner of Park Avenue and Corinth Street; staff recommends approval subject to the site plan.
#2Application for a new Specific Use Permit allowing alcoholic beverage sales in a general merchandise or food store larger than 3,500 sq ft within a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay on a CR Community Retail District property at the corner of Lovett Avenue and Military Pkwy; staff recommends approval subject to site plan and conditions.
#3Application for a new Planned Development Subdistrict on HC Heavy Commercial property within Planned Development District 193 (Oak Lawn Special Purpose District) at the east corner of Maple Avenue and Mahon Street; staff recommends approval subject to a conceptual plan and conditions.
#4Rezoning application to change a property on E. Illinois Avenue and Mayforge Drive from NS(A) Neighborhood Service District to CR Community Retail District; staff recommends approval.
#5Application to amend Planned Development District 963 on the west line of Durham Avenue between Northwest Highway and Wentwood Drive; staff recommends approval subject to amended conditions.
#6Application for a new planned development district allowing GO(A) General Office District uses on property currently zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District at Samuell Boulevard and St. Francis Avenue; staff recommends approval subject to a development plan and conditions.
#7Application for a new Specific Use Permit authorizing the sale of alcoholic beverages at a Walgreens on Lemmon Avenue within the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#8Zoning case Z-25-000170 requests rezoning from MF-1(A) Multifamily District to MU-2 Mixed Use District on the north line of Wynnewood Drive between S. Zang Boulevard and S. Llewellyn Avenue, with staff recommending approval.
#9Zoning case Z-25-000177 requests rezoning from MF-2(A) Multifamily District to MU-1 Mixed Use District on the east line of S. Polk Street at the terminus of Nokomis Avenue, with staff recommending approval.
#10Zoning case Z-25-000178 requests a new Specific Use Permit for vehicle display, sales, and service on CA-1(A) Central Area District property at the intersection of North Pearl Street, Crockett Street, and San Jacinto Street, with staff recommending approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#11Zoning case Z-25-000202 requests termination of Deed Restriction Z778-181 on property within Planned Development District 830 (Davis Street Special Purpose District) on the south line of Fouraker Street between N. Vernon Avenue and N. Van Buren Avenue, with staff recommending approval.
#12Application to rezone property at the northwest corner of Nutwood Circle and Davenport Road from R-10(A) Single Family District to NO(A) Neighborhood Office District, with staff recommending approval.
#13Application to rezone property on the south line of Elam Road, west of Buttercup Lane from NS(A) Neighborhood Service District to D(A) Duplex District, with staff recommending approval.
#14Application to amend Specific Use Permit 129 for electrical substation uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District on Calumet Avenue between Meredith and Garfield Avenues, with staff recommending approval subject to an amended site plan and conditions.
#15Application to amend Specific Use Permit 2569 to allow a bar, lounge, or tavern and inside commercial amusement limited to a live music venue within Planned Development 269 (Deep Ellum/Near East Side District) at the corner of Main Street and Malcolm X Boulevard, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#16Application to amend Specific Use Permit 2180 to allow an open-enrollment charter school on property zoned Regional Retail District at the northwest corner of East R.L. Thornton Frwy and Ferguson Road; staff recommends approval subject to a traffic management plan and conditions.
#17Application for a new Specific Use Permit for a bar, lounge, or tavern in the Deep Ellum/Near East Side District on the south line of Elm Street between Good Latimer Expy and Crowdus Street; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#18Application to rezone property from P(A) Parking District to R-7.5(A) Single Family District and terminate existing deed restrictions on property within the H/72 Peak's Suburban Addition Neighborhood Historic District on N. Carroll Avenue; staff recommends approval of both requests.
#19Application for a new Specific Use Permit for the sale of alcoholic beverages in conjunction with a general merchandise or food store of 3,500 square feet or less on property zoned Community Retail District with a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay at the northwest corner of Bruton Road and N. Prairie Creek Road; staff recommends approval subject to a site plan and conditions.
#20Amendment to Specific Use Permit 2358 to allow an alcoholic beverage establishment (microbrewery, micro distillery, or winery) at the corner of Commerce and Browder Streets within the H/121 Dallas Power and Light Building Historic District Overlay. Staff recommends approval subject to site plan and conditions.
#21Amendment to Specific Use Permit 2507 to permit alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with a restaurant and small general merchandise or food store on Lake June Road east of N. St. Augustine Road, within a D-1 Liquor Control Overlay. Staff recommends approval subject to site plan and conditions.
#22Application to rezone a property at the northwest corner of McShann Road and Preston Road from R-16(A) Single Family District to RTN Residential Transition District. Staff recommends approval.
#23Application to rezone property on Bickers Street east of Esmalda Drive from R-5(A) Single Family District to TH-3(A) Townhouse District, with applicant-volunteered deed restrictions. Staff recommends approval.
#24Application to amend Planned Development District 703, bounded by Hillcrest Road, Aberdeen Avenue, Airline Road, and Lakehurst Avenue, with staff recommending approval subject to an amended development plan, traffic management plan, and conditions. Applicants are Dallas ISD and Elsie Thurman.
#25Application to remove the D Liquor Control Overlay from property within Planned Development District 298 (Bryan Area Special Purpose District) on the southeast line of Swiss Avenue northeast of North Haskell Avenue, with staff recommending approval.
#26Application to rezone property from R-7.5(A) Single Family District to MF-2(A) Multifamily District between North Boulevard Terrace and Plymouth Road; staff recommends the lesser-density TH-3(A) Townhouse District instead. The case is under advisement after multiple continuances.
#27Application for a new Planned Development Subdistrict within PD 631 (West Davis Special Purpose District) at the southwest corner of W. Davis Street and S. Cockrell Hill Road, on property zoned R-7.5(A) with an existing Special Use Permit for a Convent; staff recommends approval subject to conditions. The case is under advisement from January 15, 2026.
#28Application for a new Planned Development Subdistrict on property currently zoned R-7.5(A) Residential within Planned Development District 631 (West Davis Special Purpose District), located on the south line of West Davis Street west of Cockrell Hill Road. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#29Application for a new planned development district to allow MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property currently zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District at the corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff recommends approval subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions.
#30Application to amend Specific Use Permit 2506 to allow a late-hours restaurant establishment (no drive-in or drive-through service) on property zoned Planned Development District 842, on Greenville Avenue north of Oram Street. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#31Application to amend Specific Use Permit 2515 to allow a late-hours restaurant establishment (no drive-in or drive-through service) on property zoned Planned Development District 842, in the area bounded by Greenville Avenue, La Vista Drive, Lewis Street, and Hope Street. Staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#32Application to replat a 3.901-acre tract on South Belt Line Road, southwest of C.F. Hawn Freeway, splitting it into one 0.588-acre lot and one 3.333-acre lot. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#33Application to create one 1.216-acre lot from an unplatted tract at the northwest corner of Denton Drive and Southwell Road in City Block C/6521. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#34Application to create one 6.515-acre lot from an unplatted tract on Cockrell Hill Road, north of Ledbetter Drive, in City Block 6959. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#35Application to create a 4-lot shared access residential development ranging from 2,170 to 3,640 square feet from a 0.26-acre tract on Arrow Road, north of Southerland Avenue, in MF-2(A) zoning. Staff recommends approval subject to docket conditions.
#36Application to create one 1.5482-acre lot from a tract of land in City Block 6955 on Cockrell Hill Road at Ledbetter Drive (southeast corner); staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#37Application to create 26 single-family lots, one common area, and a private street dedication from a 14.681-acre tract on Keller Springs Road west of Preston Road; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#38Application to create 8 lots ranging from 0.501 to 7.894 acres from a 14.899-acre tract and dedicate a public right-of-way on Skyfrost Drive northwest of Jacobson Drive; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#39Application to replat a 0.4107-acre tract in City Block B/3438 into two lots (0.1647 acres and 0.2311 acres) on property between Fouraker Street and Davis Street east of Van Buren Avenue; staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#40Application to replat a 0.261-acre tract in City Block 16/647 to create one lot on San Jacinto Street, southwest of Carroll Avenue, zoned PD 298 (Subarea 4); staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#41Application to replat a 0.392-acre tract in City Block 4/7047 to create one lot on Laughlin Drive, southeast of Ferguson Road, zoned MF-2(A); staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#42Application to replat a 0.232-acre tract in City Block C/667 to create one lot on Munger Avenue, northeast of Annex Avenue, zoned MF-2(A); staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#43Application to create one 4.741-acre lot from a tract in City Block 7965 on Fairport Road, east of Lawton Drive, zoned R-7.5(A); staff recommends approval subject to conditions.
#44Application to replat a 3.142-acre tract between Gallagher Street and Morris Street, west of Harston Street, creating one 0.118-acre lot and one 3.024-acre lot. The applicant and owner is New Pilgrim Rest Baptist Church, with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#45Application to replat a 4.449-acre tract at the northeast corner of Plano Road and Havencreek Court, creating 18 residential lots, a common area, dedicated right-of-way, and removing an existing 30-foot platted building line along Plano Road. Applicant is Highlander School, Inc., with staff recommending approval subject to conditions.
#46Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 147.4-square-foot front-lit individually mounted channel letters sign on the southern façade (south elevation) of 899 N Stemmons Fwy, with both staff and the SSDAC recommending approval.
#47Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for a 147.4-square-foot front-lit individually mounted channel letters sign on the northern façade (north elevation) of 899 N Stemmons Fwy, with both staff and the SSDAC recommending approval.
#48A Certificate of Appropriateness application by Francisco Silva of Silva Signs & Service for a 76.6-square-foot LED illuminated flat attached sign at 1909 Bryan St (East Elevation), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#49A Certificate of Appropriateness application by David Brown of ASI Signage Innovations for an 80-square-foot LED illuminated flat attached sign at 2717 Howell St (Southwest Elevation), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#50A Certificate of Appropriateness application by Polo Padilla of Fusion AE for a 33.6-square-foot combination of non-illuminated flat attached signs on the North Houston Street façade at 501 Elm St, Suite 100 (West Elevation), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#51A Certificate of Appropriateness application by Polo Padilla of Fusion AE for a 5-square-foot non-illuminated flat attached sign on the Elm Street façade at 501 Elm St, Suite 100 (South Elevation), with both staff and SSDAC recommending approval.
#52Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 6.8-square-foot combination of non-illuminated flat attached signs on the North Houston Street and Elm Street façades at 501 Elm St, Suite 100. Both staff and SSDAC recommend approval.
#53Application for a Certificate of Appropriateness to install a 53.4-square-foot combination of non-illuminated canopy signs on the Elm Street façade at 501 Elm St, Suite 100. Both staff and SSDAC recommend approval.
CITY PLAN COMMISSION PUBLIC COMMITTEE MEETINGS Monday, February 3, 2026 ZONING ORDINANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE (ZOAC) MEETING - Monday, February 3, 2026, at 9:00 a.m. at City Hall, in Room 6ES and by vid
Municue is in beta
We're building the most comprehensive municipal intelligence platform. Your feedback shapes what we build next.