Deed Restriction Termination at Fouraker Street

Context: Two separate record errors appear in Z-25-000202 before Council acted: the February 5 CPC minutes show Housewright voting while absent from the room, and the March 5 result line states 'Carried: 12 to 0' while vote data shows Forsyth and Kocks in opposition.

Recommended: Obtain the staff transmittal sent to Council before April 22 and compare it to certified CPC minutes — if Council was told the March 5 vote was 12-0 when Forsyth and Kocks actually dissented, the ordinance may be void for a corrupted record rather than merely voidable, which means the 30-day certiorari window does not cap your remedy. Fifty-seven days have elapsed since adoption; confirming the void/voidable distinction is now the threshold question before any challenge strategy.

Context: The March 5 vote was recorded as 12-0 but was actually 12-2 with Forsyth and Kocks opposed, suggesting contested conditions in the final version that may differ from what the February 5 hearing approved — and those conditions govern your entitlements.

Recommended: Request the original deed restriction document from Dallas city records now and map exactly which use or density limits lift under the termination ordinance — this case ran two CPC hearings with the vote tightening from 14-0 to 12-2, which typically signals conditions were added or revised between sessions and could affect what you can legally permit on the site.

Context: The March 5 minutes record 'Carried: 12 to 0' but vote data shows Forsyth and Kocks in opposition; separately, the February 5 record shows commissioner Housewright voting while out of the room — two documentation errors in a single case before a Council action that appeared unanimous.

Recommended: File a public records request today for the certified CPC minutes from both the February 5 and March 5 hearings and the staff transmittal to Council, then ask the city clerk directly whether the 12-2 March 5 vote — opposed by Forsyth and Kocks — was disclosed before Council approved this case alongside 15 other zoning approvals on April 22; if the transmittal said the commission was unanimous when it was not, that is the story.