Municue

Multifamily Planned Development at Worth and North Peak

View full legal title

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Representative: Tommy Mann U/A From: January 15, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

Zoning Casesite_specificSignificantCity Council, City Plan Commission
A proposal to rezone property at the east corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street from single-family to multifamily uses was submitted for city approval. The rezoning would enable significantly increased housing density at this location, which was previously restricted to single-family development. The City Council approved the proposal on April 8, 2026.
5 eventsFirst seen Aug 7, 2025Last activity Apr 8, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000015
City Council: ApprovedApr 8, 2026
Approximate location·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney
As of Apr 2026

Confirm challenge deadline and Kingston conflict for Worth-Peak apartment rezoning

Applies if: Representing parties opposing the rezoning

Context: Kingston was removed from the room during a City Plan Commission vote on Z-25-000015 and the commission formally recessed from 3:33 to 3:45 p.m. specifically to handle the conflict, but Texas Local Government Code §171 requires a written disclosure that should be in the public record and has not been publicly cited.

Recommended: If representing parties opposing this rezoning, confirm the applicable challenge deadline running from the April 8, 2026 ordinance adoption and separately request Commissioner Kingston's written conflict-of-interest disclosure — the recusal is documented in the vote record but the underlying relationship is not stated, which may be material to a procedural challenge.

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →
Developer
As of Apr 2026

Cross-check Worth-Peak apartment rezoning ordinance against all planning commission approvals

Context: Z-25-000015 was heard at City Plan Commission three separate times (August 2025, January 2026, February 2026), each hearing a potential opportunity for conditions to be layered or modified before the April 8 City Council adoption.

Recommended: Request the enrolled ordinance from the April 8, 2026 City Council meeting and compare its conditions line-by-line against the staff reports from each of the three City Plan Commission hearings — conditions added or revised across multiple rounds can create compliance gaps that surface only when the building permit application is reviewed.

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →
Journalist
As of Apr 2026

Pull City Plan Commission staff reports for Worth-Peak apartment rezoning

Context: Z-25-000015 went through three separate City Plan Commission hearings over eight months before stalling at City Council on March 25, 2026 and finally passing April 8 — an unusually long path for a site-specific zoning case that passed unanimously at every stage, with no public explanation of what changed.

Recommended: File a public records request for the staff reports from all three City Plan Commission hearings (August 7, 2025; January 15, 2026; February 5, 2026) and the March 25 City Council agenda item where this case appeared but was not resolved — comparing across five appearances will reveal whether the application was substantively modified between rounds and what drove the two-week Council delay.

Source: City Council — Apr 08, 2026 →

Trust Proof

What we said then vs what happened next

We said (Apr 7, 2026):

Request postponement records for Worth Street apartment rezoning

What happened (Apr 8, 2026):

Approved

We said (Apr 7, 2026):

Ask what changed after March 25 Worth Street rezoning hearing

What happened (Apr 8, 2026):

Approved

We said (Apr 7, 2026):

Pull Kingston conflict disclosure before Worth Street Council vote

What happened (Apr 8, 2026):

Approved

We said (Apr 7, 2026):

Confirm April 8 City Council will vote on Worth Street rezoning

What happened (Apr 8, 2026):

Approved

We said (Mar 31, 2026):

Register to speak at City Council on Worth Street rezoning

What happened (Apr 8, 2026):

Approved

Timeline

Vote
Approved

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Z234-354(MB)/Z-25-000015 Note: This item was deferred by the City Council at the public hearing on March 25, 2026, and is scheduled for consideration on April 8, 2026. *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Hearing
Hearing Open; Deferred

A public hearing to receive comments regarding an application for and an ordinance granting a new Planned Development District for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and North Peak Street Recommendation of Staff: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Recommendation of CPC: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions Z234-354/Z-25-000015 *In alignment with ForwardDallas.

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan, façade plan, and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Representative: Tommy Mann U/A From: January 15, 2026. Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of new PD for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses with conditions: Group Residential Facility prohibited, 20% facade transparency, tandem parking rules, no parking fees

Kingston listed as Conflict — out of room when vote was taken (not counted in for/against/absent). Commission recessed at 3:33 p.m. and reconvened at 3:45 p.m.

Vote
Carried: 14 to 0

An application for a new planned development district for MF-2(A) Multifamily District uses on property zoned R-7.5(A) Single Family District, on the east corner of Worth Street and N. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and conditions. Applicant: Devonshire Ventures, LLC Planner: Martin Bate Council District: 2 Z-25-000015 / Z234-354

Vote: 14 for, 0 against, 1 absent

hold under advisement until February 5, 2026

Vote
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a minor amendment to a development plan on property zoned Tract 2 within Planned Development District No. 561 on the north line of Keller Springs Road, west of Preston Road, on the north line of Keller Springs Road, west of Preston Road. Staff Recommendation: Approval. Applicant: Herbert Hears Planner: Teaseia Blue, B. Arch, MBA Council District: 12 M234-038(TB) / MZ-25-000015

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of minor amendment to development plan, Tract 2 within PDD 561