Municue

Mixed-Use Planned Development at Main Street

View full legal title

An application for 1) a new Planned Development District for a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses on property zoned CS Commercial Service District, on the southeast line of Main Street, northeast of S. Peak Street; and for 2) a new subdistrict within of Planned Development District 1002 on property zoned IM Industrial Manufacturing District, on the north corner of N. Washington Avenue and Main Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: Main Washington Partners, LLC / Thomas Tucker Representative: Baldwin Associates, LLC / Robert Baldwin U/A From: February 19, 2026. Planner: Justin Lee Council District: 2 Z-25-000132

active
Zoning CasedistrictSignificantCity Plan CommissionDistrict 1002
A new Planned Development District is proposed on the southeast side of Main Street near S. Peak Street to allow a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses on property currently zoned for commercial service. This would change the zoning and development potential of the site. The City Plan Commission is reviewing the application.
2 eventsFirst seen Feb 19, 2026Last activity Mar 26, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000132
Topics
zoning
development
housing
Approximate location·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 3 actions. Filter by: , , .

Attorney

Assess Protest Petition Eligibility Before City Council Vote on Main Street Planned Development

Why now: Under Texas Local Government Code Section 211.006, the protest petition window closes when City Council votes; the City Plan Commission approved Z-25-000132 unanimously 12-0 on March 26 and the matter is now advancing directly to City Council, making this the last procedural lever available to any opponent.

What to do: Determine whether property owners within 200 feet of the Main Street and South Peak Street site represent at least 20 percent of the affected area — if so, a protest petition filed before City Council votes triggers a three-fourths supermajority requirement, raising the adoption threshold from a simple majority and significantly increasing leverage to block or renegotiate the planned development.

Act before: After City Council votes on the ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →
Developer

Verify Approved Planned Development Conditions Match Your Application at Main Street

Why now: Item 11 on the March 26 City Plan Commission docket for Z-25-000132 was noted as 'heard individually,' distinguishing it from the 12 other zoning cases resolved on consent that same day — an indicator that conditions may have been adjusted from what was originally proposed.

What to do: Request the City Plan Commission's written conditions from the March 26 hearing and compare them line-by-line against your submitted application before City Council schedules the adoption vote — the case was designated for individual presentation rather than consent, which typically signals the commission discussed or modified proposed conditions, and any discrepancy will surface at permitting and cause costly delays.

Act before: After ordinance effective date

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →
Journalist

Compare Rubin's Two Conflict Filings for Main Street Planned Development

Why now: Rubin declared a conflict of interest and left the room before voting at both the February 19 (Item 17) and March 26 (Item 11) City Plan Commission hearings on Z-25-000132 — a recurring recusal from the same active case that warrants disclosure review before City Council adopts the ordinance.

What to do: Pull Commissioner Rubin's conflict-of-interest disclosures from both the February 19 and March 26 City Plan Commission hearings on this case and compare them — the same commissioner recused from the same planned development at two separate hearings, and whether the underlying conflict is a financial stake, property ownership, or business relationship with the applicant has not been explained in any public document.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Mar 26, 2026 →

Timeline

Vote
Carried: 12 to 0

An application for 1) a new Planned Development District for a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses on property zoned CS Commercial Service District, on the southeast line of Main Street, northeast of S. Peak Street; and for 2) a new subdistrict within of Planned Development District 1002 on property zoned IM Industrial Manufacturing District, on the north corner of N. Washington Avenue and Main Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: Main Washington Partners, LLC / Thomas Tucker Representative: Baldwin Associates, LLC / Robert Baldwin U/A From: February 19, 2026. Planner: Justin Lee Council District: 2 Z-25-000132

Vote: 12 for, 0 against, 2 absent

recommend approval with change: add SUP requirement to reference local utility use

Rubin - conflict, out of room when voting

Vote
Carried: 12 to 0

An application for a new Planned Development District for a mix of residential, commercial, and light industrial uses on property zoned IM Industrial Manufacturing District and CS Commercial Service District, on the north corner of N. Washington Avenue and Main St., and on the southeast line of Main Street northeast of S. Peak Street. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to conditions. Applicant: Main Washington Partners, LLC / Thomas Tucker Representative: Baldwin Assocaites, LLC / Robert Baldwin Planner: Justin Lee Council District: 2 Z-25-000132

Vote: 12 for, 0 against, 2 absent

hold under advisement until March 26, 2026 and direct staff to re-notify to expand PD 1002 with new subdistrict

Heard individually. Rubin declared conflict of interest and was out of room when voting.