Municue

Planned Development Subdistrict at Newton Avenue

View full legal title

An application for a new Planned Development Subdistrict for MF-2 Subdistrict uses on property zoned MF-2 Multifamily Subdistrict within Planned Development District 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on the north line of Newton Avenue, between Throckmorton Street and Oak Lawn Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Phil Tinsley / M&A DevCo LLC Representative: Mallory Muse / Winstead PC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 14 Z-25-000209

active
Zoning CasedistrictNotableCity Plan CommissionDistrict 14
A new Planned Development Subdistrict designation is proposed for multifamily uses on property along Newton Avenue between Throckmorton Street and Oak Lawn Avenue, within the existing Oak Lawn Special Purpose District. This zoning flexibility allows alternative site plan and architectural approaches for multifamily residential development in this area. The City Plan Commission will review the application.
1 eventFirst seen Apr 23, 2026Last activity Apr 23, 2026Case ID: Z-25-000209
Topics
development
housing
zoning
Newton Avenue and Throckmorton Street·Show on Google Maps ↗
Newton Avenue and Oak Lawn Avenue·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 4 actions. Filter by: , , , .

Attorney

Map Council hearing date for Newton Avenue protest petition window

Why now: Z-25-000209 passed City Plan Commission 13-0 on April 23, 2026 and is now advancing directly to City Council for final vote, opening the statutory protest petition window.

What to do: The moment the City Council agenda is published with this case, identify the hearing date and begin collecting signatures from adjacent property owners within 200 feet — those owners can force a three-fourths supermajority vote by filing a valid protest petition before the hearing, but the signature-gathering window will be days, not weeks.

Act before: After City Council hearing on this item

Source: City Plan Commission — Apr 23, 2026 →
Developer

Confirm habitat garden signage amendment in Newton Avenue ordinance draft

Why now: Kingston's amendment was offered verbally during the April 23 hearing and accepted by Hall as seconder on a 13-0 vote, but verbal friendly amendments are not always captured verbatim when staff transcribes the final ordinance draft.

What to do: Before the ordinance is placed on the Council agenda, pull the filed Planned Development Subdistrict draft and verify that Kingston's April 23 friendly amendment to Section S-_.113(c)(3) — clarifying habitat garden signage language — is accurately transcribed from the verbal motion into the submitted text; any gap between what was voted on and what is filed becomes a compliance obligation you cannot renegotiate after recordation.

Act before: After Council adopts ordinance

Source: City Plan Commission — Apr 23, 2026 →
Journalist

Find what drove the habitat garden requirement in Newton Avenue rezoning

Why now: Kingston's friendly amendment to Section S-_.113(c)(3) was added verbally at the April 23 hearing on a 13-0 vote with no explanation appearing in the public case summary, and records requests typically receive responses within 10 business days.

What to do: Request the City Plan Commission staff report and the applicant's full correspondence file for this case and pinpoint what prompted a last-minute signage condition on a habitat garden — this type of condition is atypical in a Planned Development Subdistrict and the public record does not explain whether it reflects a negotiated community benefit, an environmental constraint on the site, or a concession the applicant made to secure unanimous commission support.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Plan Commission — Apr 23, 2026 →
Lobbyist

Request Council district briefing before Newton Avenue rezoning hits consent

Why now: The April 23 CPC vote was 13-0 with no dissent and no noted opposition, the two factors most predictive of consent-agenda placement at Dallas City Council, where items move without discussion unless a member pulls them.

What to do: Contact the council member whose district includes Newton Avenue and request a pre-vote briefing before the ordinance is placed on the consent agenda — a 13-0 City Plan Commission vote is the clearest signal that staff will route this item to consent, which eliminates floor debate and forecloses any opportunity to negotiate last-minute conditions or raise concerns publicly.

Act before: After Council agenda is published with this item

Source: City Plan Commission — Apr 23, 2026 →

Timeline

Hearing
Carried: 13 to 0

An application for a new Planned Development Subdistrict for MF-2 Subdistrict uses on property zoned MF-2 Multifamily Subdistrict within Planned Development District 193, the Oak Lawn Special Purpose District, on the north line of Newton Avenue, between Throckmorton Street and Oak Lawn Avenue. Staff Recommendation: Approval, subject to a development plan and staff’s recommended conditions. Applicant: Phil Tinsley / M&A DevCo LLC Representative: Mallory Muse / Winstead PC Planner: Mona Hashemi Council District: 14 Z-25-000209

Vote: 13 for, 0 against, 1 absent

recommend approval of new PD Subdistrict for MF-2 uses with amended conditions

Commission recessed at 2:08 p.m. and reconvened at 2:18 p.m. Kingston offered friendly amendment clarifying Section S-_.113(c)(3) habitat garden signage language; accepted by Hall as seconder