Which government bodies are involved in Pecan Hollow Golf Course Erosion Control (26-582)?

This matter has been reviewed by: City Council.

When was Pecan Hollow Golf Course Erosion Control (26-582) first introduced?

This matter was first recorded on 2026-05-26 00:00:00+00.

Pecan Hollow Golf Course Erosion Control (26-582)

Q: What is the current status of To approve an increase to the current awarded contract amount of $3,347,634 by $711,337 for a total contract amount of $4,058,971 for Pecan Hollow Golf Course Erosion Control for Holes 6 and 7, Project No. ENG-D-7419.1, from Cardinal Strategies Construction Services, LLC for the Engineering Department; and authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. (Contract No. 2025-0366-B; Change Order No. 1) Approved?

As of the last recorded event on 2026-07-01 00:00:00+00, this matter is active. It has appeared in 2 events across City Council.

View full legal title

To approve an increase to the current awarded contract amount of $3,347,634 by $711,337 for a total contract amount of $4,058,971 for Pecan Hollow Golf Course Erosion Control for Holes 6 and 7, Project No. ENG-D-7419.1, from Cardinal Strategies Construction Services, LLC for the Engineering Department; and authorizing the City Manager to execute all necessary documents. (Contract No. 2025-0366-B; Change Order No. 1) Approved

active

Contractsite_specificCity Council

The city is approving a $711,337 increase to the contract with Cardinal Strategies Construction Services for erosion control work at Pecan Hollow Golf Course (Holes 6 and 7), bringing the total contract value to $4,058,971. The project addresses soil erosion and protects the golf course's infrastructure and playability.

2 eventsFirst seen May 26, 2026Last activity Jul 1, 2026File #: 26-582

Topics

parks

environment

contract

Pecan Hollow Golf Course·Show on Google Maps ↗

Get notified on new hearings, votes, or status changes for this matter.

Actions

Showing all 2 actions. Filter by: , .

Attorney

Check Pecan Hollow erosion contract for Texas bid-law compliance

Why now: The contract appeared before Council twice within five weeks (May 26, July 1, 2026), a pattern consistent with an unexplained post-award amendment rather than a routine award.

What to do: Pull the dollar figures from the May 26 and July 1 staff reports and compare them — if the July 1 appearance reflects a change order that increased the original contract price by more than 25%, Texas Local Government Code §252.048 required new competitive bidding rather than a Council amendment vote.

Act before: After next hearing on this item

Source: City Council — Jul 01, 2026 →

Journalist

Investigate why Pecan Hollow golf erosion contract returned twice

Why now: The matter appeared before City Council twice, five weeks apart (May 26 and July 1, 2026), with no stated reason in the available record.

What to do: Pull and compare the City Council staff reports from the May 26 and July 1 meetings to see whether the erosion control contract was pulled, amended, or contested — the public record gives no explanation for why it came back five weeks later.

Act before: After records request response (typically 10 business days)

Source: City Council — Jul 01, 2026 →